Determining the Ideal Strategy and Modeling in Integrating Spending Reviews in Budget Decision Making at the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia
Abstract
This study aims to find the right strategy and modelling in integrating Spending Review in budget decision making at the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative approach with an exploratory method, in which the researcher seeks to explore and build the phenomena being studied to answer the previously formulated problems. The results showed that the spending review integration strategy was divided into three dimensions, namely the organizational size, the process dimension and the time dimension. Meanwhile, the modelling used in integrating spending review in budget decision making in the Indonesian Ministry is known as the Comprehensive Monitoring and Evaluation Model for Budget Management Ministries / Institutions.
References
Andrews, M., & Hill, H. (2003). The impact of traditional budgeting systems on the effectiveness of performance‐based budgeting: a different viewpoint on recent findings. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(2), 135-155
Arena, M., & Arnaboldi, M. (2013). Debate: Dealing with spending reviews—Italy. Public Money & Management, 33(1), 4-6.
Berry, C. and D. Sinclair (2010). Intergenerational Fairness and the Spending Review 2010. London UK: Intergenerational Longevity Centre.
Brugnon, G. P. N. (2013). Public Engagement Practices in Spending Review Processes of the UK, Italy and France. Master Graduation Thesis, Politecnico di Milano, Italy.
Cassell, C., Cunliffe, A. L., & Grandy, G. (Eds.). (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods. London: Sage.
Cassell, C., Cunliffe, A. L., & Grandy, G. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods. London: Sage.
Catalano, G., & Erbacci, A. (2018). A theoretical framework for spending review policies at a time of widespread recession. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 17(2), 9-24.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches-4th ed. SAGE Publications, Inc
Diamond, P. (2013). ‘Spending Wisely: Principles for a Good Spending Review': The First Report of the Fabian Commission on Future Spending Choices. The Political Quarterly, 84(4), 527-533
Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan, Kementerian Keuangan RI. (2018). Spending Review 2018: Meningkatkan 'Value for Money' Belanja Kementerian / Lembaga; Kementerian Keuangan.
Direktorat Penyusunan APBN, Direktorat Jenderal Anggaran, Kementerian Keuangan RI. (2017). Informasi APBN 2017; APBN yang Lebih Kredibel dan Berkualitas di Tengah Ketidakpastian Global.
Ferry, L., & Eckersley, P. (2015). Budgeting and governing for deficit reduction in the UK public sector: act three accountability and audit arrangements. Public Money & Management, 35(3), 203-210.
Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
Hawkesworth, I. and K. Klepsvik. (2013). Budgeting levers, strategic agility and the use of performance budgeting in 2011/12. OECD Journal on Budgeting.
Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55-65.
Melkers, J. E., & Willoughby, K. G. (2001). Budgeters’ views of state performance‐budgeting systems: Distinctions across branches. Public Administration Review, 61(1), 54-64.
OECD. (2011). Typology and Implementation of Spending Reviews. OECD SBO Meeting on Performance and Results, November 2011.
Parhusip, B. (2016). Analisis Implementasi Spending Review pada Kementerian Negara/Lembaga Tahun 2013-2015. Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 20(3), 191-211.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis—Into the age of austerity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Postuła, M. (2017). Spending Reviews–a Tool to Support the Efficient Management of Public Funds. Journal of Management and Business Administration, 25(2), 63-90.
Prabowo, C. E. (2018). Spending review 2018: Meningkatkan value for money belanja pemerintah. Indonesian Treasury Update, 3(2), 30-42.
Robinson, M. (2013). Spending Review. Working Party of Senior Budget Officials. 3’th Annual Meeting of OECD Senior Budget Officials, OECD Conference Centre, Paris, 3-4 June, 1-8.
Robinson, S. E. (2003). Bureaucrats and public schools: Does bureaucratization promote incrementalism in program budgeting for Texas school? The University of Texas at Dallas Political Economy Working Paper, Richardson, Texas.
Rutgers, M. R., & Van Der Meer, H. (2010). The origins and restriction of efficiency in public administration: Regaining efficiency as the core value of public administration. Administration & Society, 42(7), 755-779.
Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioural science. The American Economic Review, 49(3), 253-283.
Thurmaier, K. (1992). Budgetary decision-making in central budget bureaus: An experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(4), 463-487.
Thurmaier, K. (1995a). Execution Phase Budgeting in Local Governments: It's not just for control anymore! State & Local Government Review, 27(2), 102-117.
Thurmaier, K. M., & Willoughby, K. G. (2001). Policy and politics in state budgeting. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance Management in the Public Sector. New York: Routledge.
World Bank. (2013). Beyond the annual budget: global experience with medium-term expenditure frameworks. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods: Applied Social Research Methods Series. Thousand Oaks.
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Science and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)
.jpg)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
