Determining the Ideal Election Model at the Provincial Level: Case Study of the Southeast Sulawesi Regional Head Election in 2018
Abstract
This research was conducted to find the right model in the provincial head elections. This is based on the many deficiencies that occur when direct regional head elections are held such as multiple voter lists, logistical problems, low capacity of organizers, the emergence of SARA issues, strong money politics, bureaucratic politicization, and low participation in voting for the community (Pilkada Case Study Southeast Sulawesi 2018). This research encourages the alternative model of the governor and deputy governor election. Furthermore, if you want to be applied in Indonesia in general, more research needs to be done. First, improvements in the overall stages of governors and deputy governors' elections and the use of information technology to increase transparency, accountability, and efficiency. Second, the governor and the deputy governor's election is still carried out directly by tightening the nomination requirements. Among other things, they must participate in the regeneration of political parties, have experience and knowledge of government and local characteristics of the region, and are indigenous people who have lived long in the area. Third, the governor is still directly elected by the community, while the deputy governor can be proposed by the governor to the DPRD/MOHA from the private sector/ASN who meet special requirements, namely experience in government and knowledge of the local characteristics of the region.
References
Akbar, I. (2016). Pilkada serentak dan geliat dinamika politik dan pemerintahan lokal Indonesia. CosmoGov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 2(1), 95-110.
Amirudin & Zaini, B. (2006). Pilkada Langsung Problem dan Prospek: Sketsa Singkat Perjalanan Pilkada 2005. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bisariyadi, B., Triningsih, A., & Rahmawaty, M. (2016). Komparasi Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilu di Beberapa Negara Penganut Paham Demokrasi Konstitusional. Jurnal Konstitusi, 9(3), 531-562.
Central Statistics Agency of Southeast Sulawesi. (2018). Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara Dalam Angka 2018. Sulawesi Tenggara: BPS.
Central Statistics Agency of Southeast Sulawesi. (2019). Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara Dalam Angka 2019. Sulawesi Tenggara: BPS.
Chalid, P. (2005). Pilkada Langsung: Demokratisasi Daerah dan Mitos Good Governance. Jakarta: Partnership
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Dahl, R. A. (1982). Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy: Autonomy vs Control. Yale University Press.
Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and Its Cristics. Yale: Yale University Press
Diamond, L. (1996). Developing Democracy toward Consolidation. London: The John Hopkins University Press.
Dirdjosanjata, P., & Kana, N. L. (2006). Demokrasi dan Potret Lokal Pemilu 2004. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Effendy, K. (2010). Memadukan Metode Kuantitaf dan Kualitatif. Bandung: Indra Prahasta.
Gaffar, A. (1999). Politik Indonesia: Transisi Menuju Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 Year 2014 Regarding the Election of Governors, Regents and Mayors.
Hanafi, R. I. (2014). Direct Eletion for Local Leaders in Indonesia: Some Critical Notes for Political Parties. Jurnal Penelitian Politik LIPI, 11(2), 1-16.
Kristiadi. J. (2006). Darurat Partai Politik. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Law Number 22 Year 2014 Regarding the Election of Governors, Regents and Mayors.
Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government.
Law Number 10 of 2016 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 1 of 2015 concerning the Establishment of Government Regulations in lieu of Law Number 1 of 2014 concerning the Election of Governors, Regents and Mayors Become Acts.
Lay, C. (2000). Antara Anarki dan Demokrasi: Masalah Kekerasan Politik di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 3(3).
Lay, C. (2007). Pilkada Langsung dan Pendalaman Demokrasi. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 11(1).
Margono, S. (2005). Reformasi Administrasi dan Paradoks Demokrasi. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 9(1).
Mariana, D. (2009). Dinamika Demokrasi dan Perpolitikan Lokal di Indonesia. Bandung: Penerbit AIPI Bandung
Marijan, K. (2010). Sistem Politik Indonesia: Konsolidasi Demokrasi Pasca-Orde Baru. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group
Nuryanti, S. (2013). Evaluasi Format Pemilukada Menuju Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik dan Efektiv di Tingkat Kabupaten/ Kota. Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 10(1).
Nuryanti, S. (2015). Intervensi Penyelenggaraan Pemilukada: Regulasi Sumberdaya dan Eksekusi. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 19(2).
Pahlevi, I. (2011). Pemilihan Gubernur secara Demokratis: Studi terhadap Gagasan Dipilih Kembali oleh DPRD di Provinsi Bengkulu. Jurnal DPD RI, 16(2).
Usman & Megawati, C. (2017). Dinamika Politik: Solusi Akhir Eksistensi Konflik dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Masyarakat Pasca Perdamaian di Aceh Besar. Jurnal Humaniora, 1 (2), 79-86.
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Science and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)
.jpg)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
