Police Discretion in Investigating Document Forgery and False Information Cases in Indonesia
Abstract
Discretion is a form of authority granted to law enforcement officers, including police investigators, to make decisions based on specific judgments to ensure the smooth progression of legal processes. The purpose of this study is to analyze the process of investigation, inquiry, and the determination of suspects in cases of document forgery. The theories utilized in this thesis research include the theory of investigation, the theory of law enforcement, and the theory of discretion. This research employs a normative juridical method, a legal research approach used to analyze and evaluate applicable legal norms and their application in practice. The findings indicate that in cases of document forgery, original evidence must be presented to investigators for subsequent seizure as valid evidence in proving the criminal act of document forgery. Photocopy evidence alone, unsupported by other evidence, is deemed inadmissible. In conclusion, the discretion applied in the investigation process and suspect determination is expected to align with legal principles. Excessive or improper use of discretion can lead to abuse of authority, ultimately undermining public trust in law enforcement institutions.
References
Abdurrachman, H., & Sudewo, F. A. (2018). The Use of Violence in Indonesian Police Investigation. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.21), 497–501.
Adawiyah, R., & Fatmawati, N. (2024). Determination of Suspects Based on Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian National Police Number 6 of 2019 Concerning Criminal Investigation (Case Study Number: 10/Pid. Pra/2024/PN Bdg). Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(2), 1018–1030.
Aristyan, C., & Harahap, E. H. (2024). Efforts To Implement the Principle Of Coordination Between Police Investigators and Prosecutors in Processing Criminal Cases in the Jurisdiction of the Pekanbaru Police Station. Anayasa: Journal of Legal Studies, 2(1), 83–92.
Asba, P., & Wahyu, M. E. (2023). Discretionary Authority of the Indonesian National Police in the Implementation of Demonstrations. Amsir Law Journal, 4(2), 156–161.
Azhari, A., & Hasibuan, S. A. (2024). Code of Professional Ethics for Police Members Who Commit Criminal Acts. Proceedings of the International Conference on Multidisciplinary Science (INTISARI), 1(1), 561–578.
Black, H. C. (1990). Black’s law dictionary: Definition of discretion. West Publishing Co.
Budianto, A. (2018). A Comparative Study of French, British, Dutch, and Russian External Supervisory Agencies of Investigators and Prosecutors within Integrated Criminal-Justice-System. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 5(3), 527–542.
Criminal Code (KUHP).
Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP).
Cryshnanda, D. (2009). Polisi penjaga kehidupan. Yayasan Pengembangan Ilmu Kepolisian.
Ersanda, R., & Suwaryono, I. L. (2023). Review of the National Police Chief’s Policy Regarding Decree Number Kep/613/III/2021 Maintaining Public Security and Order in Certain Areas. Khazanah Sosial, 5(3), 559–568.
Haerul, A., & Zainuddin, Z. (2023). Restorative justice: An approach in the settlement of land crimes in the Indonesian national police. European Journal of Law and Political Science, 2(2), 46–52.
Hamzah, A. (2010). Hukum acara pidana Indonesia.
Hasibuan, P., Sofyan, A. M., Karim, M. S., & Haeranah, H. (2022). Arrest Authority by Police Investigators and BNN Investigators on Narcotics Crimes. 9th Asbam International Conference (Archeology, History, & Culture in the Nature of Malay) (ASBAM 2021), 612–618.
Harun, M. H. (1991). Penyidik dan penuntut dalam proses pidana. PT Rineka Cipta.
Hutahaean, A., & Indarti, E. (2020). Implementation of investigation by the Indonesian national police in eradicating corruption crime. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 23(1), 136–154.
Idy, M. Y. (2022). Law Enforcement Against Members of The Indonesian National Police Commit Crimes. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 5(2), 143–157.
Indonesian National Police Circular Letter No. SE/8/VII/2018, dated July 27, 2018.
Indonesian National Police Regulation No. 1 of 2009 (PERKAP) on the Use of Force in Police Actions.
Indonesian National Police Regulation No. 6 of 2019 on Criminal Investigations.
Law Number 2 of 2002 on the Indonesian National Police.
Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration.
Manik, J. D. N., Budiono, A. R., Djatmika, P., & Nurjaya, I. N. (2017). The authority investigators civil servant in the criminal justice system. JL Pol’y & Globalization, 58, 78.
Muchsin, T., Saliro, S. S., Sihaloho, N. T. P., & Manullang, S. O. (2020). Discression of the Sambas Resorts Police in The Implementation of Administrative Law Perspective Investigation. Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 147–159.
Prasetyo, J. (2021). Legal Reconstruction of Police Discretion in Handling Minor Crimes Based on the Value of Justice. Sch Int J Law Crime Justice, 4(9), 551–556.
Purba, T. L. D. (2018). The Role of Indonesian Police Investigators in Order to Criminal Information and Electronic Transactions in Papua. Papua Law Journal, 2(2), 179–196.
Puspitasari, R. T. (2024). Roles and Responsibilities of the Police in Investigating Narcotics Crimes Committed by Children. Ratio Legis Journal, 3(1), 365–373.
Riyadi, B. S., Hermanto, A. B., Herlina, I., & Purnomo, H. (2020). Discretion of Power of the Indonesian National Police Impacts the Abuse of Power in the Case of Letter Forgery of Red Notice" Fugitive Djoko Tjandra". International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1292–1300.
Saleh, R. (1980). Segi-segi hukum pidana dan hukum acara pidana dalam pelaksanaan pembangunan nasional. Aksara Baru.
Saleh, W. (1997). Tindak pidana korupsi. Ghalia Indonesia.
Setiawan, S., Ablisar, M., Sunarmi, S., & Mulyadi, M. (2023). Competence of The Authority of Military Police Investigators on Money Laundering Criminal Cases in Connection Cases. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 512–521.
Sitorus, R. Y., & Amal, B. K. (2022). Police Professionalism in Prevention of Violent Criminal Acts by the Police in Indonesia. Randwick International of Social Sciences (RISS) Journal, 3(1), 102–115.
Susetyo, D. T., Hartiwiningsih, H., & Rustamaji, M. (2024). Legal Review of Police Discretional Authority in Terminating Investigations, Implications for Victims in Searching for Justice and Legal Truth. International Conference on Cultural Policy and Sustainable Development (ICPSD 2024), 252–258.
Sutarman, N. K., & Purnomo, H. (2023). Discretion As An Entry Point For Resolving Criminal Cases Through Restorative Justice: Building Justice And Peace. International Journal of Asia Pasific Collaboration, 1(3), 72–81.
Tresna, R. (2000). Komentar HIR. Pradnya Paramita.
Utomo, B. (2018). The Implementation of Restorative Justice by Indonesian National Police Investigators in Traffic Accidents Resulting in Death. IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies), 3(2), 81–98.
Winata, E., & Nasution, H. A. R. (2024). The Role of The Criminal Investigation Unit (Satreskrim) of The Deli Serdang Police Region in Identifying Victims of Criminal Acts. Proceedings of the International Conference on Multidisciplinary Science (INTISARI), 1(2), 257–266.
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Science and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)
.jpg)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
