The Dynamics Of Sociopolitical Polarization: In-Depth Analysis Of Causes, Consequences, And Mitigation Strategies
Abstract
Sociopolitical polarization is a global phenomenon that affects the stability and cohesion of society, exacerbated by economic inequality, the role of the media, social identity, and the dynamics of international politics. Its impact on democracy, security, public policy, and economic growth creates an urgent need for deeper understanding and effective mitigation strategies. This research aims to analyze the causes, and consequences, and identify mitigation strategies for Sociopolitical polarization. The research was carried out using a descriptive qualitative approach, relying on data from relevant previous studies to process and analyze the phenomenon comprehensively. The results of the research show that Sociopolitical polarization is caused by various interrelated factors and has a broad impact on the social and political structure of society. Effective mitigation strategies include education and media literacy, dialogue and reconciliation, changes in political policies and practices, and regulation of technology and media. However, significant challenges such as resistance to change, the complexity of social identities, and global dynamics require a holistic and sustainable approach. Building consensus in a polarized society and creating a more integrated society is key to overcoming polarization. This research offers valuable insights for stakeholders in designing more effective strategies for reducing Sociopolitical polarization.
References
Antronico, L., De Pascale, F., Coscarelli, R., & Gullà, G. (2020). Landslide risk perception, social vulnerability and community resilience: The case study of Maierato (Calabria, southern Italy). International journal of disaster risk reduction, 46, 101529.
Ardag, M. M., Castanho Silva, B., Thomeczek, J. P., Bandlow-Raffalski, S. F., & Littvay, L. (2020). Populist attitudes and political engagement: Ugly, bad, and sometimes good?. Representation, 56(3), 307-330.
Bilewicz, M., & Soral, W. (2020). Hate speech epidemic. The dynamic effects of derogatory language on intergroup relations and political radicalization. Political Psychology, 41, 3-33.
Bobrowicz, R., & Nowak, M. (2021). Divided by the rainbow: Culture war and diffusion of paleoconservative values in contemporary Poland. Religions, 12(3), 170.
Bosher, L., Chmutina, K., & van Niekerk, D. (2021). Stop going around in circles: towards a reconceptualisation of disaster risk management phases. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 30(4/5), 525-537.
Charron, N., Lapuente, V., & RODRÍGUEZ‐POSE, A. N. D. R. É. S. (2023). Uncooperative society, uncooperative politics or both? Trust, polarization, populism and COVID‐19 deaths across European regions. European Journal of Political Research, 62(3), 781-805.
Eranfeno, G. N., Gemeda, A. J., & Bamano, A. Z. (2024). News discourses threatening multiculturalism in Ethiopian mainstream TV channels: Discourse historical approach. Heliyon.
Giuliani, F., De Falco, A., & Cutini, V. (2021). Unpacking seismic risk in Italian historic centres: A critical overview for disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 59, 102260.
Hariram, N. P., Mekha, K. B., Suganthan, V., & Sudhakar, K. (2023). Sustainalism: An integrated socio-economic-environmental model to address sustainable development and sustainability. Sustainability, 15(13), 10682.
Izenberg, M., Clark-Ginsberg, A., Clancy, N., Busch, L., Schmidt, J., & Dixon, L. (2022). Efforts to end a stalemate in landslide insurance availability through inclusive policymaking: A case study in Sitka, Alaska. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 80, 103202.
Judge, M., Kashima, Y., Steg, L., & Dietz, T. (2023). Environmental Decision-Making in Times of Polarization. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 48.
McCoy, J., & Somer, M. (2021). Overcoming polarization. Journal of Democracy, 32(1), 6-21.
Merkel, W., & Lührmann, A. (2021). Resilience of democracies: responses to illiberal and authoritarian challenges. Democratization, 28(5), 869-884.
Mishra, S., Anderson, K., Miller, B., Boyer, K., & Warren, A. (2020). Microgrid resilience: A holistic approach for assessing threats, identifying vulnerabilities, and designing corresponding mitigation strategies. Applied Energy, 264, 114726.
Myrick, R. (2021). Do external threats unite or divide? Security crises, rivalries, and polarization in American foreign policy. International Organization, 75(4), 921-958.
Nugent, E. R. (2020). The psychology of repression and polarization. World Politics, 72(2), 291-334.
Pahleviannur, M. R., De Grave, A., Saputra, D. N., Mardianto, D., Hafrida, L., Bano, V. O., ... & Sinthania, D. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Pradina Pustaka.
Rekker, R. (2021). The nature and origins of political polarization over science. Public Understanding of Science, 30(4), 352-368.
Schedler, A. (2023). Rethinking Political Polarization. Political Science Quarterly, qqad038.
Somer, M., McCoy, J. L., & Luke, R. E. (2021). Pernicious polarization, autocratization and opposition strategies. Democratization, 28(5), 929-948.
Sovacool, B. K., Schmid, P., Stirling, A., Walter, G., & MacKerron, G. (2020). Differences in carbon emissions reduction between countries pursuing renewable electricity versus nuclear power. Nature Energy, 5(11), 928-935.
Tsatsanis, E., Lisi, M., & Freire, A. (2021). The ‘Lost Generation’and Its Political Discontents: Age-related Divides in Southern Europe after the Crisis. South European Society and Politics, 26(2), 133-151.
Vecchi, A., Silva, E. S., & Jimenez Angel, L. M. (2021). Nation branding, cultural identity and political polarization–an exploratory framework. International Marketing Review, 38(1), 70-98.
Vu, T. V. (2022). Unbundling the effect of political instability on income redistribution. European Journal of Political Economy, 75, 102189.
Weber, T. J., Hydock, C., Ding, W., Gardner, M., Jacob, P., Mandel, N., ... & Van Steenburg, E. (2021). Political polarization: challenges, opportunities, and hope for consumer welfare, marketers, and public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 40(2), 184-205.
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Science and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)
.jpg)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
