Geopolitical Tensions In The Modern World: A Comprehensive Global Risk Analysis And The Path Forward For International Diplomacy
Abstract
Geopolitical Tensions In The Modern World Have Become A Major Concern For Countries Around The World, Fueled By Shifts In Economic And Military Power, As Well As Intensifying Competition For Resources. These Dynamics Are Complicated By The Impact Of Technology And Innovation, As Well As Regional Instability That Affects Global Security And Prosperity. Emerging Conflicts And Crises Demand New Approaches In International Diplomacy To Promote Peace And Stability. This Research Aims To Comprehensively Analyze The Global Risks Posed By Geopolitical Tensions And Explore The Way Forward For International Diplomacy. This Research Uses A Qualitative Approach, With Data Obtained From Previous Research Results And Related Studies To Gain In-Depth Insight Into This Issue. The Results Of This Research Show That Geopolitical Tensions Require A Collaborative And Innovative Global Response, With International Cooperation And Strengthening International Institutions As The Main Key. The Future Of International Diplomacy Depends On Adapting To The Digital Era, Effectively Utilizing Soft Power, And Creating New Models Of Cooperation That Can Address The Challenges Of The 21st Century. The Importance Of Commitment To International Dialogue And Cooperation Was Emphasized, As The Main Means Of Creating Sustainable Global Peace And Security. Success In Overcoming Geopolitical Tensions Will Determine The Stability And Progress Of Humanity In The Future.
References
Agnoletti, M., Manganelli, S., & Piras, F. (2020). Covid-19 and rural landscape: The case of Italy. Landscape and urban planning, 204, 103955.
Armondi, S. (2022). Towards geopolitical reading of ‘periphery’in state spatial strategies: Concepts and controversies. Geopolitics, 27(2), 526-545.
Aven, T., & Zio, E. (2021). Globalization and global risk: How risk analysis needs to be enhanced to be effective in confronting current threats. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 205, 107270.
Bicchi, F., & Schade, D. (2022). Whither European diplomacy? Long-term trends and the impact of the Lisbon Treaty. Cooperation and Conflict, 57(1), 3-24.
Bluwstein, J., Cavanagh, C., & Fletcher, R. (2023). Securing conservation Lebensraum? The geo-, bio-, and ontopolitics of global conservation futures. Geoforum, 103752.
Desouza, K. C., Ahmad, A., Naseer, H., & Sharma, M. (2020). Weaponizing information systems for political disruption: The actor, lever, effects, and response taxonomy (ALERT). Computers & Security, 88, 101606.
Flew, T. (2020). Globalization, neo-globalization and post-globalization: The challenge of populism and the return of the national. Global Media and Communication, 16(1), 19-39.
Goddard, S. E., & Larkin, C. (2023). ‘The most humane of all weapons’: Discrimination, airpower, and precision doctrine. European Journal of International Security, 8(4), 531-549.
Hart, D., & Siniver, A. (2020). The meaning of diplomacy. International Negotiation, 26(2), 159-183.
Hou, K. H. (2023). The Social Construction of the Ocean, Sea Power, and Maritime Transformation. Journal of Political & Military Sociology, 50(1), 32-56.
Hui-Min, L. I., Xue-Chun, W. A. N. G., Xiao-Fan, Z. H. A. O., & Ye, Q. I. (2021). Understanding systemic risk induced by climate change. Advances in Climate Change Research, 12(3), 384-394.
Jones, A. (2020). Towards an emotional geography of diplomacy: Insights from the United Nations Security Council. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 45(3), 649-663.
Li, J., Shapiro, D., Peng, M. W., & Ufimtseva, A. (2022). Corporate diplomacy in the age of US–China rivalry. Academy of Management Perspectives, 36(4), 1007-1032.
Mitchell, S. M. (2020). Clashes at sea: explaining the onset, militarization, and resolution of diplomatic maritime claims. Security studies, 29(4), 637-670.
Munasinghe, M. (2020). COVID-19 and sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 23(1-2), 1-24.
Muraille, E., Naccache, P., & Pillot, J. (2022). The Tragedy of Liberal Democratic Governance in the Face of Global Threats. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 902724.
Qin, Y. (2020). Diplomacy as relational practice. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(1-2), 165-173.
Ruffini, P. B. (2020). Conceptualizing science diplomacy in the practitioner-driven literature: a critical review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1-9.
Schreer, B. (2022). A geopolitical and geostrategic blueprint for NATO’s China challenge. Comparative Strategy, 41(2), 189-202.
Settembre-Blundo, D., González-Sánchez, R., Medina-Salgado, S., & García-Muiña, F. E. (2021). Flexibility and resilience in corporate decision making: a new sustainability-based risk management system in uncertain times. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(Suppl 2), 107-132.
Sultana, F. (2021). Climate change, COVID-19, and the co-production of injustices: a feminist reading of overlapping crises. Social & Cultural Geography, 22(4), 447-460.
Towns, A. E. (2020). ‘Diplomacy is a feminine art’: Feminised figurations of the diplomat. Review of International Studies, 46(5), 573-593.
Wang, Q., Ren, F., & Li, R. (2023). Exploring the impact of geopolitics on the environmental Kuznets curve research. Sustainable Development.
Zafeiropoulos, G., Drinia, H., Antonarakou, A., & Zouros, N. (2021). From geoheritage to geoeducation, geoethics and geotourism: A critical evaluation of the Greek region. Geosciences, 11(9), 381.
Zareie, S., Bozorg-Haddad, O., & Loáiciga, H. A. (2021). A state-of-the-art review of water diplomacy. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 2337-2357.
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Science and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)
.jpg)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
