Human Resources Management Strategy in the Military Justice Environment: Study of State Civil Apparatus Management at the High Court of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia

  • Zidny Taqiyya Politeknik STIA LAN, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Asropi Politeknik STIA LAN, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Ratri Istania Politeknik STIA LAN, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Pengadilan Militer, Disparitas, Peraturan, Mahkamah Agung.

Abstract

The Supreme Court is a judicial institution vested with authority to exercise judicial power in four separate branches of the judiciary, namely the General Courts, Religious Courts, Administrative Courts, and Military Courts. The Military Court, in particular, serves as the judicial body responsible for upholding the law and justice for members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI). Unlike the other three branches of the judiciary, the Military Court system consists of three appellate courts and one main court. The existence of these four courts is governed by Law Number 31 of 1997 on Military Judiciary and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 125 of 2009 on the Delegation of Authority to High-Ranking Officials and Chief Justices of Appellate Courts within the Supreme Court for Signing in the Field of Personnel. However, the implementation of these regulations has still resulted in varying interpretations and paradigm differences, especially in understanding the phrase "appellate court," which has been perceived as somewhat biased and not fully implemented. This is particularly evident in the coordination and management of Civil Servants (ASN), as the Supreme Court places the Main Military Court on par with the appellate courts, although in practice, the Main Military Court resembles a "court above the appellate courts." This research employs a qualitative approach with a specific Case Study research method, focusing on the differential treatment of ASN members who represent a minority within the Military Judiciary. Ultimately, the study recognizes the need to bring together perspectives and unify understandings regarding the implementation of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 125 of 2009, analyzed through the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) theory, in order to harmonize the management and governance of appellate courts. This would help eliminate disparities between the High Military Court and the Main Military Court, serving as a bridge of understanding within the Military Judiciary in Indonesia.

References

Adam, A. W. (2009). Membongkar manipulasi Sejarah. Jakarta: Kompas Alexander L. George dan Andrew Bennett. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in The Social Science. Cambridge: BCSIA.

Amir, H. (2019). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan (Research and Development) Uji Produk Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif Proses dan Hasil. Malang: Literasi Nusantara Abadi.

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Asdi Mahasatya.Jakarta.

Bryan Garner. (1999). Black’s Law Dictionary, Minnesota: St Paul Minn.

Creswell, J, W. (2012). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Cetakan Kedua. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Keterampilan Esensial Untuk Peneliti Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Danim, S. (2012). Motivasi kepemimpinan & efektivitas kelompok.Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105.

Gulo, W. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo. Suwati, Yuli. 2013. Pengaruh kompensasi dan motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan pada PT. Tunas hijau Samarinda. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Bisnis, 1(1), 41-55.

Hasan Alwi et. al. (2002). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Balas Pustaka.

Herdiansyah, H. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif untuk Ilmu-ilmu Sosial.Jakarta:Salemba Humanika.

Kreitner. Robert & Angelo Kinicki. (2014). Organizational Behavioral. Ed. 5.Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Kusmarni, Y. (2012). Studi kasus. UGM Jurnal Edu UGM Press, 2.

Luhulima. (2006). Hari-Hari Terpanjang Mundurnya Presiden Soeharto dan Beberapa Peristiwa Terkait. Jakarta.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd.

Moleong, L. J. (2014). Metode penelitian kualitatif edisi revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana, D. & S. (2013). Metode Penelitian Komunikas:contoh-contoh penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan praktis. Cetakan ke 3. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya,.

Panalar, A (2020) Analisis Strategi Pengelolaan Ambidexterity Antara Rasionalitas dan Kreativitas (Studi Kasus 3 UKM Studio Video Game) (Tesis Magister, Universitas Islam Indonesia). Diakses dari: https://dspace.uii.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/20398/01%20cover.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Prihatsanti, U., Suryanto, S., & Hendriani, W. (2018). Menggunakan studi kasus sebagai metode ilmiah dalam Psikologi. Buletin Psikologi, 26(2), 126-136.

Ratnawati, S. (2020). Analisis SWOT dalam menentukan strategi pemasaran (studi kasus di kantor pos Kota Magelang 56100). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 17(2), 58-70. 17, 58–70.

Rukajat, A. (2018). Pendekatan penelitian kualitatif (Qualitative research approach). Deepublish.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Kuantitatif Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Kuantitatif. In Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (pp. 13–19). In Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.

Sutopo, A., & Setya Budi, T. (2016). Model Penilaian Kualitas Terjemahan Karya Sastra.

Sarundajang, S.H. (2000). Arus Balik Kekuasaan Pusat ke Daerah. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Usman, S. (2008). Mengapa Rakyat Indonesia Mendukung Presiden Suharto?. Jakarta: Djakarta.

Wajong, J. (1961). Fungsi Administrasi Publik. Djakarta: Djambatan.

Yona, S. (2006). Penyusunan studi kasus. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia, 10(2), 76-80.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1997 tentang Peradilan Militer

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara

Peraturan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Nomor 125 Tahun 2009 tentang Pendelegasian sebagian Wewenang kepada Pejabat Eselon I dan Ketua Pengadilan Tingkat Banding di Lingkungan Mahkamah Agung untuk Penandatanganan di Bidang Kepegawaian

Jejak Kasus Aung San Suu Kyi hingga Vonis 4 Tahun Penjara (cnnindonesia.com) (diakses pada 28 September 2023 pukul 10.00 WIB)

Sejarah Peradilan Militer di Indonesia (dilmilti-jakarta.go.id) (diakses pada 28 September 2023 Pukul 14.00)

Published
2023-10-30
How to Cite
Taqiyya, Z., Asropi, & Istania, R. (2023). Human Resources Management Strategy in the Military Justice Environment: Study of State Civil Apparatus Management at the High Court of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. International Journal of Science and Society, 5(5), 298-320. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v5i5.889