Digital Governance of Project Management System using Soft Systems Methodology , Case Study of SOE Holding Survey Services (IDSurvey)

Budi  Prakoso; Rachma  Fitriati

doi:10.54783/ijsoc.v5i5.884

Budi Prakoso Indonesian Classification Bureau (BKI-PT Biro Klasifikasi Indonesia)
Rachma Fitriati University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v5i5.884

Keywords: E-government, Project Management, Digital Governance, Business Strategy, SOE Holding.

Abstract

This article aims to establish the digital governance of the project management system at PT Biro Klasifikasi Indonesia (BKI). As a holding company for BUMN Survey Services (IDSurvey), although there is already a Decree of the BKI Board of Directors No. DU.007/HK.303/KI-21 concerning Refinement of Business Portfolio Determination for SBU (Strategic Business Unit) Function Improvement, but in practice, there are still various obstacles in BKI project management, such as delays in project completion and target mismatches in project management. This study uses a qualitative method with a soft systems methodology approach with research time from January to August 2023 at the BKI Head Office. By using e-government, digital governance, and project management, the study results show that BKI needs to develop a standard operating procedure for digital governance of project management in order to succeed in the project. This study recommends that after the SOP for Digital Governance of the Management System is made, the SVP of Commercial Business Operations, as the leading sector, needs to socialize and disseminate the governance SOP that is made.

References

Budiarso, Putro, U. S., Sunitiyoso, Y., & Fitriati, R. (2022). Constructing the collaborative Working Relationships in one of the Big Four Firms. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 35(5), 679–709.

Burgelman, R., & Siegel, R. (2008). Cutting the Strategy Diamond in High-Technology Ventures. Stanford University, Graduate School of Business, Research Papers, 50. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1111770

Checkland, P. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley.

Checkland, P. (2000). Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty-Year Retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17, S11–S58. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1+<::AID-SRES374>3.0.CO;2-O

Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for Action. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Chen, Y.-C. (2017). Managing digital governance: issues, challenges, and solutions. Routledge.

Chen, Y.-C., & Hsieh, J.-Y. (2009). Advancing E-Governance: Comparing Taiwan and the United States. Public Administration Review, 69, S151–S158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02103.x

Christensen, C. M. (2007). Disruptive innovation: can health care learn from other industries? A conversation with Clayton M. Christensen. Interview by Mark D. Smith. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 26(3), w288–w295.

Christensen, C. M., McDonald, R., Altman, E. J., & Palmer, J. E. (2018). Disruptive innovation: An intellectual history and directions for future research. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1043–1078.

Christiansen, J., & Bunt, L. (2012). Innovation in policy: allowing for creativity. Social Complexity and Uncertainty in Public Governance, 38.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Qualitative research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Devi, E. T., Wibisono, D., Mulyono, N. B., & Fitriati, R. (2023). Designing an information-sharing system to improve collaboration culture: a soft systems methodology approach in the digital service creation process. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.

Fitriati, R. (2015). Menguak Daya Saing UMKM Industri Kreatif: Sebuah Riset Tindakan Berbasis Soft Systems Methodology. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Gómez Díaz, C., González-Cancelas, N., Camarero Orive, A., & Soler Flores, F. (2023). Digital Governance Approach to the Spanish Port System: Proposal for a Port. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(2), 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11020311

Jackson, M. (2003). Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers.

Jia, K., & Chen, S. (2022). Global digital governance: paradigm shift and an analytical framework. Global Public Policy and Governance, 2(3), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00047-w

Kemp, S. (2023). Digital 2023: Indonesia. In Data Reportal. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-indonesia

Kerzner, Harold., & Saladis, F. P. (2009). Project management workbook and PMP/CAPM exam study guide. J. Wiley & Sons.

Melitski, J., Carrizales, T. J., Manoharan, A., & Holzer, M. (2011). Digital governance success factors and barriers to success in prague. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 14(4), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-14-04-2011-B001

Muhaling, A. R., Palandeng, I. D., & Sumarauw, J. S. B. (2021). Implementasi standar operasional prosedur (sop) layanan pada pt. taspen (pesero) cabang manado. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 9(4), 572–581.

Nations, U. (2020). E-Government Survey 2020: Digital Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development. Technical Report. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations.

O. Ehiane, S., Lauda J. Goyayi, M., & David Adejuwon, K. (2019). Revolutionising public service delivery through digital governance : assessing the government to citizens (G2C) scenario in Nigeria. Affrika: Journal of Politics, Economics and Society, 9(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.31920/2075-6534/2019/9n1a1

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.

Reynolds, M., & Holwell, S. (2020). Introducing systems approaches. Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide, 1–24.

Santoso, M. I. (2015). Applying interactive planning on public service leadership in the directorate general of immigration Indonesia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169, 400–410.

Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum.

Schwab, K., & Sala-i-Martín, X. (2016). The global competitiveness report 2013–2014: Full data edition.

Serrador, P., & Rodney Turner, J. (2014). The Relationship between Project Success and Project Efficiency. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.011

Shenhar, A. J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., & Maltz, A. C. (2001). Project success: a multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Planning, 34(6), 699–725.

Soeharto, I. (1999). Manajemen Proyek (2nd ed.). Erlangga.

Suryaatmaja, K., Wibisono, D., Ghazali, A., & Fitriati, R. (2020). Uncovering the failure of Agile framework implementation using SSM-based action research. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1–18.

Tiwari, S. P. (2022). Services for Science and Education-United Kingdom Organizational Competitiveness and Digital Governance Challenges. Archives of Business Research, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.103.12016

Wasono, L. W., & Furinto, A. (2018). The effect of digital leadership and innovation management for incumbent telecommunication company in the digital disruptive era. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2.29), 125–130.

Wilopo, W., & Fitriati, R. (2016). The Institutional Governance in the Strategic Restructuring of the Information and Communication Technology Universal Service Obligation to Strengthen National Competitiveness. BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Organisasi, 22(3), 6.

Wong, W., & Welch, E. (2004). Does e‐government promote accountability? A comparative analysis of website openness and government accountability. Governance, 17(2), 275–297.

Yunus, Y. M., Aman, A., & Keliwon, K. B. (2019). The Role of Business Leaders in Information Technology Innovation in the New Era of Disruptive Technology. Asian Journal of Accounting & Governance, 12.