Norway's Climate Odyssey: Assessing Impacts, Mitigation Strategies, and Policy Responses in a Warming Arctic

  • Jakob Oliver Bergen University, Norway
Keywords: Climate Odyssey, Assessing Impacts, Mitigation Strategies, Policy Responses, Warming Arctic.

Abstract

Norway, a nation renowned for its dramatic landscapes, stands at the forefront of confronting the global climate crisis, particularly within the unique context of a warming Arctic. This article embarks on a comprehensive exploration of Norway's responses to the climate challenge, offering a nuanced assessment of climate change impacts, evaluation of mitigation strategies, and analysis of policy responses. The Arctic, with its iconic glaciers, fjords, and delicate ecosystems, bears witness to the unfolding narrative of climate transformation. Our assessment of climate change impacts reveals a landscape in flux, marked by melting glaciers, altered precipitation patterns, and shifting ecosystems. The article delves into the multifaceted implications of these changes, from their ecological consequences to their socio-economic effects on key sectors such as agriculture, fisheries, tourism, and infrastructure. Norway's proactive stance in mitigating climate change emerges through a rich tapestry of strategies. From the development of renewable energy sources to groundbreaking carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects, the nation has harnessed innovation and sustainability to navigate the path toward a low-carbon future. Emissions reduction targets, legislative frameworks, and international collaborations align Norway's climate policies with global agreements like the Paris Agreement.

References

Basran, C. J., & Rasmussen, M. H. (2020). Conflicts between Arctic Industries and Cetaceans. Arctic Marine Sustainability: Arctic Maritime Businesses and the Resilience of the Marine Environment, 95-115.

Berkman, P. A., & Vylegzhanin, A. N. (2012). Conclusions: Building Common Interests in the Arctic Ocean. In Environmental Security in the Arctic Ocean (pp. 371-404). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Craik, N., Davenport, T., & Mackenzie, R. (2023). Liability for Environmental Harm to the Global Commons. Cambridge University Press.

Daisy, N. S., Hafezi, M. H., Liu, L., & Lee, K. (2022). A comprehensive review of Canadian marine oil spill response system through the lens of decanting regulations and practices. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(9), 1310.

Depledge, J. (2021). Climate Policy after the 2015 Paris Climate Conference (pp. 1-138). J. E. Viñuales, E. Lees, & D. M. Reiner (Eds.). Routledge.

Dingman, E. (2015). Arctic Council Environmental Initiatives: Can the United States Promote Implementation?. Arctic Yearbook 2015, 86.

Frühling, S., & O'Neil, A. (2021). Local accommodation: Norway and nuclear weapons cooperation in NATO. In Partners in deterrence (pp. 69-95). Manchester University Press.

Johannsdottir, L., & Cook, D. (2019). Systemic risk of maritime-related oil spills viewed from an Arctic and insurance perspective. Ocean & Coastal Management, 179, 104853.

Jørgensen, E. K. (2023). Technological Organization and Initial Production Stages of a Maritime Slate Tradition: Insights from the First Investigated Stone Age Slate Source in Arctic Europe (the Djupvik slate formation, Norway). Acta Borealia, 40(1), 46-77.

Norazahar, N., Khan, F., Veitch, B., & MacKinnon, S. (2018). Dynamic risk assessment of escape and evacuation on offshore installations in a harsh environment. Applied Ocean Research, 79, 1-6.

Pappas, C., Babst, F., Fatichi, S., Klesse, S., Paschalis, A., & Peters, R. L. (2023). A Circumpolar Perspective on the Contribution of Trees to the Boreal Forest Carbon Balance. In Boreal Forests in the Face of Climate Change: Sustainable Management (pp. 271-294). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Pavlov, A. K., Leu, E., Hanelt, D., Bartsch, I., Karsten, U., Hudson, S. R., ... & Granskog, M. A. (2019). The Underwater Light Climate in Kongsfjorden and Its Ecological Implications. The Ecosystem of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard, 137-170.

Pereira, L., Kuiper, J. J., Selomane, O., Aguiar, A. P. D., Asrar, G. R., Bennett, E. M., ... & Ward, J. (2021). Advancing a Toolkit of Diverse Futures Approaches for Global Environmental Assessments. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 191-204.

Perrin, S. W., Bærum, K. M., Helland, I. P., & Finstad, A. G. (2021). Forecasting the Future Establishment of Invasive Alien Freshwater Fish Species. Journal of Applied Ecology, 58(11), 2404-2414.

Provencher, J., Kögel, T., Lusher, A., Vorkamp, K., Gomiero, A., Peeken, I., ... & Farmen, E. (2022). An Ecosystem-Scale Litter and Microplastics Monitoring Plan under the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). Arctic Science, 8(4), 1067-1081.

Rabe, B., Kaliban, C., & Englehart, I. (2020). Taxing Flaring and the Politics of State Methane Release Policy. Review of Policy Research, 37(1), 6-38.

Rukke, B. A., Querner, P., Hage, M., Steinert, M., Kaldager, M., Sømhovd, A., ... & Aak, A. (2023). Insecticidal Gel Bait for the Decimation of Ctenolepisma longicaudatum (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) Populations in Libraries, Museums, and Archives. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 59, 255-263.

Saliba, M., Frantzi, S., & van Beukering, P. (2022). Shipping Spills and Plastic Pollution: A Review of Maritime Governance in the North Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 181, 113939.

Soroos, M. S. (1992). The Odyssey of Arctic Haze toward a Global Atmospheric Regime. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 34(10), 6-27.

Varnajot, A. (2020). Rethinking Arctic Tourism: Tourists’ Practices and Perceptions of the Arctic in Rovaniemi. Nordia Geographical Publications, 49(4), 108-108.

Vogt, R. D., de Wit, H., & Koponen, K. (2022). Case Study on impacts of Large-Scale Re-/Afforestation on Ecosystem Services in Nordic Regions. NEGEM-Quantifying and Deploying Responsible Negative Emissions in Climate Resilient Pathways.

Published
2023-09-14
How to Cite
Jakob Oliver. (2023). Norway’s Climate Odyssey: Assessing Impacts, Mitigation Strategies, and Policy Responses in a Warming Arctic. International Journal of Science and Society, 5(4), 347-362. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v5i4.791