Governance Developments in Challenge Situations: A Case Study of the Governance in Aceh after 2005 Helsinki Memorandum of Agreement
Abstract
This study explored about the Governance Developments in Challenge Situations in Aceh after 2005 Helsinki Memorandum of Agreement. The 2005 Helskinki Memorandum of Agreement brings promise into welfare and better governance for Aceh people. However, there are problems such as welfare and governance (corrupt leaders). First, the problem of socio-economic development in Aceh after the Helsinki agreement apparently occurred not at the stage of regulation and budget support, but at the leadership stage. Second, leadership problems have persisted even though elections have been held. This is an indication of elite problems in governance in Aceh. These two backgrounds form the basis for this article to discuss the main issue of Why Aceh's Governance after Helsinki Memorandum of Understanding in 2005 has not run optimally in providing for the needs of the Acehnese people. Using quantitative and qualitative methods, this article provides the relations between political elites on good public governance. Academically, this article will be able to provide a new dimension of form of relations between political elites on good public governance. Practically, this article can provide recommendations on the form of relations between political elites that affect good public governance in the success of the Aceh Government's development programs.
References
Ananto, E. A., Darma, T. S., Ridwan, N. M., & Rizaldi, A. (2020). Satu Dasawarsa Otonomi Khusus Aceh Tahun Anggaran 2008 s.d. 2018. In Pusat Kajian Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara Badan Keahlian DPR RI (Vol. 53, Issue 9). http://repositori.dpr.go.id/249/1/KAJIAN OUTSUS ACEH.pdf.
Ball, N. (2002). Democratic Governance in the Security Sector (Issue February).
Budiono, A., Faizurrahman, A., Muammal, A., Ikbar Nariswara, M., Ferry Irfansyah, R., & Norman, Y. T. (2022). Aceh Autonomy Policy and Qanun Post-Helsinki Agreement. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 9(2), 771–776. http://ijmmu.comhttp//dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i2.3639.
Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2018). Why Leadership of Public Leadership Research Matters: And What to Do About It. Public Management Review, 20(9), 1265–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1348731.
Denzin, N. K. (1994). Romancing the Text : The Qualitative Researcher-Writer-as-Bricoleur. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 15–30.
Haus, M., & Klausen, J. E. (2011). Urban leadership and community Involvement: Ingredients for Good Governance? Urban Affairs Review, 47(2), 256–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087410388867.
Kadir, M. Y. A. (2012). A Study on Peace Agreement Helsinki Memorandum of Understanding 2005. Aceh International Journal of Social Sciences, 1(December), 14.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido-lobatón, P. (1999). Governance Matters. In World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (Issue August). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=188568.
Kingsbury, D. (2015). Timing and Sequencing Peace in Aceh. In CPRD Working Paper No. 42. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198757276.003.0021.
Kooiman, J. (1999). Social-Political Governance. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 1(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037800000005
Law Number 11 (2006). Acehnese government.
MDKIK SPs UGM. (2022). Laporan Penelitian Studi Tata Kelola Pemerintahan di Aceh Pasca Nota Kesepahaman (Memorandum of Understanding) Helsinki Tahun 2005.
Mongan, F. F. A., Suryandari, N. N. A., & Pembonan, A. (2019). Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance terhadap Ml. Jurnal Ekonomi Paradigma, 21(01), 40–46. https://journal.uniba.ac.id/index.php/PRM/article/view/10.
Morfit, M. (2007). The Road to Helsinki: The Aceh Agreement and Indonesia’s Democratic Development. International Negotiation, 12(1), 111–143. https://doi.org/10.1163/138234007X191939.
Mustopadidjaja. (2020). Membangun Kepemerintahan Lokal yang Baik (Local Good Governance) dalam Menyongsong Otonomi Daerah. In Jurnal Wacana Kinerja: Kajian Praktis-Akademis Kinerja dan Administrasi Pelayanan Publik (Vol. 3, Issue 3, pp. 1–11). http://jwk.bandung.lan.go.id/ojs/index.php/jwk/article/view/606.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding Governance: Ten Years On. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076586
Samsu. (2017). Metode Penelitian (Issue 17).
Sedarmayanti, Gunawan, S., Pradesa, H. A., & Sitorus, T. A. T. (2020). The Effect of Good Governance, Leadership and Organizational Culture on Public Performance Accountability. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i1/6807.
Supriadi, I., & Hwan, S. S. (2007). Aceh: Balloting for Peace and Democracy Pilkada Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (NAD) 2006 (Issue December).
Syahputra, I., & Baiduri, R. (2018). Eksistensi Partai Politik Lokal pada Era Otonomi Khusus Aceh. Jurnal Antropologi Sumatera, 16(1), 1–6.
Zainal, S. (2022). Keistimewaan Aceh dan Pembangunan Perdamaian dalam Tinjauan Sosio Historis. Jurnal Sosiologi USK (Media Pemikiran & Aplikasi), 16(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.24815/jsu.v16i1.25706.
Zulkarnaen, I., & Suzanna, E. (2018). Aceh: Conflict Development after the Helsinki Agreement. Emerald Reach Proceedings Series, 1, 589–593. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-793-1-00095.
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Science and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)
.jpg)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
