Law Enforcement of the Financial Services Authority against Customer Rights on Fraudulent Promissory Notes Issued by Non-Bank Financial Institutions
Abstract
The development of the economy in Indonesia requires large funds so that it is necessary to provide facilities for the provision of funds needed by the community, so that the creation of financial institutions, one of which is a non-bank financial institution. Non-Bank Financial Institutions are business entities in the financial sector that are allowed to collect and distribute funds to the public but not in the form of savings, demand deposits or time deposits. Promissory Notes are commercial securities that are regulated by law, in this case a non-bank financial institution that issues promissory notes as a means of transaction must obtain permission from financial institutions, namely the Financial Services Authority and Bank Indonesia. Based on the background of the problems above that have been explained, the issue that will be raised is how is Law Enforcement from the Financial Services Authority against fraudulent promissory note customers from Non-Bank Financial Institutions that do not have a license. The method used is normative juridical which is carried out to obtain the necessary legal materials related to the object of research. The results of this study are based on the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 35/POJK.05/2018 concerning Conducting a Financing Company Business spurring the growth of the performance of the financing industry which is considered not optimal.
References
Agarwal, S., & B Muckley, C. (2022). Law Enforcement Spillover Effects in the Financial Sector. European Financial Management, 28(5), 1477-1504.
Badenhoop, N. (2020). The Individual Protection Goal in EU Banking Regulation–A Process towards Private Law Enforcement. Forthcoming in: S Grundmann and P Sirena (eds), European Contract Law in the Banking and Financial Union (Intersentia, 2020).
Budiono, H., & Moeliono, T. P. (2006). Asas Keseimbangan bagi Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia: Hukum Perjanjian Berlandaskan Asas-Asas Wigati Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Cranston, R., & Cranston, R. (1979). Law Enforcers and Law Enforcement. Regulating Business: Law and Consumer Agencies, 11-49.
Dambe, K., Hunt, S., Iscenko, Z., & Brambley, W. (2013). Applying Behavioural Economics at the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Occasional Paper, (1).
Della Negra, F. (2019). MiFID II and Private Law: Enforcing EU Conduct of Business Rules (Vol. 2). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Fuady, M. (2002). Hukum tentang Pembiayaan dalam Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Gatot, S. (2009). Perbankan dan Masalah Kredit Suatu Tinjauan di Bidang Yuridis. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Greebel, E. L., Moriarty, K., Callaway, C., & Xethalis, G. (2015). Recent key Bitcoin and Virtual Currency Regulatory and Law Enforcement Developments. Journal of Investment Compliance.
Hamidi, J., & Lutfi, M. (2010). Hukum Lembaga Kepresidenan Indonesia. Alumni.
Hasan. S. (2011). Hukum Investasi dan Pasar Modal. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Herring, R., & Carmassi, J. (2008). The Structure of Cross‐Sector Financial Supervision. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 17(1), 51-76.
Ilmih, A. A. (2021). Law Enforcement and Prevention of Banking Criminal Actions in Indonesia. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(3), 5733-5744.
Jenie, S. I. (2016). Beberapa Perjanjian yang Berkenaan dengan Kegiatan Pembiayaan. Yogyakarta, Yayasan Penerbit Gajahmada.
Khaq, I. E., & Hidayat, A. (2022). The Law Enforcement against an Illegal Online Loans Platform. Ius Positum Journal of Law Theory and Law Enforcement, 85-98.
Mahanani, A. E. E., Fitriana, Z. M., Anggriawan, T. P., & Wahyudi, E. (2021). Kausalitas Kesadaran dan Budaya Hukum dalam Membentuk Kepatuhan Hukum Kebijakan Penanggulangan Covid-19. Widya Pranata Hukum: Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum, 3(2), 64-74.
Mierzewski, M. B., DeSimone, B. S., Hochberg, J. W., & Larkin, B. P. (2010). The Dodd-Frank Act Establishes the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection as the Primary Regulatory of Consumer Financial Products and Services. Banking lJ, 127, 722.
Oemar, M. (2021). Reconstruction of Law Enforcement against Crime in Banking Based on Justice Value. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 4(7), 458-464.
Peterson, C. L. (2015). Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Law Enforcement: An Empirical Review. Tul. L. Rev., 90, 1057.
Simorangkir. O.P. (2022). Pengantar Lembaga Keuangan Non-Bank, Ghalia, Indonesia.
Skeva, S., Larmuseau, M. H., & Shabani, M. (2020). Review of Policies of Companies and Databases Regarding Access to Customers’ Genealogy Data for Law Enforcement Purposes. Personalized Medicine, 17(2), 141-153.
Soekanto, S. (2007). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum dan Survei. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Soekanto, S. (2012). Kesadaran Hukum dan Kepatuhan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali.
Sudiyana, S. (2019, July). Legal Enforcement Model in Indonesia Capital Market Disputes to Make Substantive Justice. In International Conference on Banking, Accounting, Management, and Economics (ICOBAME 2018) (pp. 222-224). Atlantis Press.
Suryono, R. R., Budi, I., & Purwandari, B. (2021). Detection of fintech P2P Lending Issues in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(4), e06782.
Tri H., & Conny, T. (2014). Bank & Insitusi Keuangan Non-Bank di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN. Abdulkadir, M., & Rilda, M. (2000). Segi Hukum Lembaga Keuangan dan Pembiayaan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Tutik, T. T., & SH, M. (2016). Konstruksi Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945. Prenada Media.
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Science and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)
.jpg)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
