Comparison of Vietnam and China Democratization (The Effect of DOI-MOI Vietnam 1987 and The China Economic Reform OF 1978)
Abstract
Vietnam and China is a reality of two authoritarian states under Communism regime. As pesimistic view, both of them judge can not consolidating democracy. But the economic growth growing fastly as the result of Doi Moi policy by Vietnam in 1987 and China’s economic reformation in 1978, are the positive signal for democracy. Communist Party (VCP and CCP) challenged to defending their legetimacy by take pragmatism way to changes their economic direction and release from the Communist orthodoxy. Economic reformation is a legetimacy transformacy nased on the performance that come from ideology. The indicator of non‐institutional democracy focus on the income distribution, and the legetimacy of Communist Party used as comparative tool of democracy in China and Vietnam.
References
2. Cipto, Bambang, International Relations in Southeast Asia, 2007, Yogyakarta, Student Library
3. Fishman, Ted.C, 2006, China.Inc: How Chinese Empowerment Opposes America and the World, Jakarta, Elex Media Komputindo
4. Nazir, Mohammad, 1998. Research Methods, Jakarta, Ghalia Indonesia,
5. Silalah, Ulber, 2009, Social Research Methods, Bandung: Refika Adhitama
6. Suryabrata, Sumadi, 1997, Research Methodology, Jakarta: P.T. Raja Grafindo Persada,
7. Weatherley Robert, 2006, Politics in China Since 1949: Legitimizing Authoritarian Rule. New York: Routledge,
8. Weller, Robert.P, 2005, Civil Live Globalization and Political Change in Asia, New York, Routledge of Scientific Articles and Journals_____________, China rural migration and plugin the rural urban gap: off news in: http://www.offnews.info/verArticulo.php?contenidoID=8044
9. Clarence B. Carson, The Concept of Democracy and John Dewey, in http://www.mmisi.org/ma/04_02/carson.pdf
10. Doh Chull Shin, The Third Wave in East Asia: Comparative and Dynamic Perspectives, Taiwan Journal of Democracy, Volume 4, No.2: 91-13, December 2008.in:http://www.tfd.org.tw/docs/dj0402/091132%20Doh%20Chull%20Shin.pdf
11. Dynamic poverty analysis in Vietnam 1993-2002, international Research and Development Center, in: http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev‐147050‐201-1-DO_TOPIC.htm
12. Edward D. Mansfield, and Richard Sisson, Political Science and the Public Interest, 2004, Columbus: Ohio State University Press, in: http://as.nyu.edu/docs/IO/2800/sisson.pdf/html
13. Elias Papaioannou, and Gregorios Siourounis, Economic and social factors Driving the Third Wave of Democratization, 2008, Journal of Comparative Economics 3, in: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~elias/greg‐elias_JCE.pdf
14. George Rideout, Competing Political Agendas And The Impact On China Reform:www.metalbuildinglink.com/Competing%20political%20agendas.pdf
15. Ginandjar Kartasasmita, Economic Development Strategy: Between Growth and Democracy in www.ginandjar.com/public/STIE%20Ahmad%20 Dahlan_GK.pdf/
16. Guillermo O'Donnell, The Perpetual Crises of Democracy, in: Journal of Democracy, 18, January 2007
17. Great Leap Forward, in: http: // www‐ chaos.umd.edu/history/prc2.html#greatleap
18. James A Dorm, Economic Reform In China, Cato Journal, vol.8 no.3 in: http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj8n3/cj8n3‐1.pdf
19. Joshua Kurlantzick, Perry Link, China: Resilient Sophisticated Authoritarianism, Freedom House, Undermining Democracy: 21st Authoritarianism. in: www.freedomhouse.org/uploads/special_report/83.pdf
20. Larry Diamond, Can China become a Democracy? in http: //www.india‐ seminar.com/2007/576/576_larry_diamond.htm
21. Ma, Laurence. 'China’s authoritarian capitalism: growth, elitism and legitimacy' International Planning Development Review, Volume 31, Issue 1, 2009
22. Naughton .B, The Chinese Economy: Transition and Growth, 2007 pages: 4 in: http://irps.ucsd.edu/assets/002/5228.pdf
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Science and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.