Implications of Power and Stakeholder Interest in the Implementation of Child Friendly City (CFC) Policies in Yogyakarta City
Abstract
The Child-Friendly City (CFC) is one of the policies developed by Yogyakarta City government to fulfill children’s rights by involving the role of stakeholders. Its implementation, however, has not optimally involve stakeholders, especially in conducting socialization and supporting the facilities to fulfill of children's rights. As the main implementers of the regional development, they must play an active role in accelerating the CFC. Thus, stakeholder mapping in the implementation of CFC policies is important to be analyzed in order to figure out the stakeholders’ interests as the basis for uniting all efforts in realizing Yogyakarta City’s Grand Design as a child-friendly city. A qualitative method with a case study research strategy was employed to analyze the stakeholders’ implementation of this policy. The result of the stakeholder mapping showed that as the key player, the Regional Development Planning Agency (Bappeda) needs to strengthen the role of coordination in synergy and integration to develop stakeholders’ potential and interests in the context setter, subject and crowd categories. Furthermore, the Yogyakarta City Government needs to carry out stakeholder engagement from the technical aspect to expand support in achieving the CFC target. Therefore, strengthening collaboration and stakeholder interest in CFC policies need to be implemented as a strategic step for the government in accelerating the CFC development according to the target set as the common goal.
References
Absor, U. M. (2011). Penanganan Anak dalam Masa Tanggap Darurat Bencana Alam: Tinjauan Konvensi Hak Anak dan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak, Jurnal Dakwah, 11(1), 17-32.
Ackerman, F & Eden, C. (2011). Strategic Management of Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Long Range Planning, 44(3), 179-196.
Anggara, Sahya. (2018). Kebijakan Publik: Pengantar. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.
Caragliu, A., & Del Bo, C. F. (2019). Smart Innovative Cities: The Impact of Smart City Policies on Urban Innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 373-383.
Chan, L. (2016). A City Fit for Children: Mapping and Analysis of Child Friendly Cities Initiatives. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Centre for Rights and Justice Occasional Paper Series, Paper No. 5, 1-60.
Clarkson, Max BE. (1995). A Stakeholders Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social finance. The Academy of Management Journal, 14(5), 319-337.
Coq-Huelva, D., & Asián-Chaves, R. (2019). Urban Sprawl and Sustainable Urban Policies. A Review of the Cases of Lima, Mexico City and Santiago de Chile. Sustainability, 11(20), 5835.
Fadlurrahman. (2019). Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Kabupaten Layak Anak di Kabupaten Magelang. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 7(1), 43-54.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston (MA): Pitman.
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006) Stakeholders Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fromhold-Eisebith, M., & Eisebith, G. (2019). What Can Smart City Policies in Emerging Economies Actually Achieve? Conceptual Considerations and Empirical Insights from India. World Development, 123, 104614.
Kadir, A. (2013). Analisis Stakeholder Pengelolaan Taman Nasional Bantimurung Bulusarung Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Manusia dan Lingkungan, 20(1), 11-21.
Leite de Almeida, C. M., Silveira, S., Jeneulis, E., & Fuso-Nerini, F. (2021). Using the Sustainable Development Goals to Evaluate Possible Transport Policies for the City of Curitiba. Sustainability, 13(21), 12222.
Lim, S. B., Malek, J. A., Yussoff, M. F. Y. M., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2021). Understanding and Acceptance of Smart City Policies: Practitioners’ Perspectives on the Malaysian Smart City Framework. Sustainability, 13(17), 9559.
Lowe, M., Adlakha, D., Sallis, J. F., Salvo, D., Cerin, E., Moudon, A. V., ... & Giles-Corti, B. (2022). City Planning Policies to Support Health and Sustainability: An International Comparison of Policy Indicators for 25 Cities. The Lancet Global Health, 10(6), e882-e894.
Masik, G., Sagan, I., & Scott, J. W. (2021). Smart City Strategies and New Urban Development Policies in the Polish Context. Cities, 108, 102970.
Mukhlis, M., & Perdana, R. (2022). A Critical Analysis of the Challenges of Collaborative Governance in Climate Change Adaptation Policies in Bandar Lampung City, Indonesia. Sustainability, 14(7), 4077.
Ndlela, N. M. (2019). Crisis Communication: A Stakeholder Approach. Australia: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reed, M.S., et.al. (2009). Who’s in and Why? Stakeholder Aalysis as A Prerequisite for Sustainable Natural Resource Management. Environ Manage Journal, 90, 1933-1949.
Renard, Yves. (2004). Guidelines for Stakeholder Identification and Analysis: A Manual for Caribbean Natural Resource Managers and Planners. Caribbean National Resource Institute.
Rodriguez-Rey, D., Guevara, M., Linares, M. P., Casanovas, J., Armengol, J. M., Benavides, J., ... & García-Pando, C. P. (2022). To What Extent the Traffic Restriction Policies Applied in Barcelona City can Improve Its Air Quality?. Science of the Total Environment, 807, 150743.
Roza, Darmini., & Laurensius Arliman S. (2018). Peran Pemerintah Daerah untuk Mewujudkan Kota Layak Anak di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, .25(1), 198-215.
Rumtianing, I. (2014). Kota Layak Anak dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Anak. Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 27(1), 7- 23.
Shaleh, F. R. (2017). Analisis Pemangku Kepentingan (Stakeholder) Waduk Sempor dalam Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Perairan Yang Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Grouper, 8(1), 7-12.
Tressa, R. (2014). Analisis Kebijakan Penyelesaian Konflik Antar Desa di Kabupaten Sigi Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah. Tesis Magister Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang. WIBAWA 1994.
Xu, N., Ding, Y., & Guo, J. (2022). Do Smart City Policies Make Cities More Innovative: Evidence from China. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 15(1), 1-17.
Yang, H., Zhai, G., Liu, X., Yang, L., Liu, Y., & Yuan, Q. (2022). Determinants of City-Level Private Car Ownership: Effect of Vehicle Regulation Policies and the Relative Price. Transport Policy, 115, 40-48.
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Science and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)
.jpg)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
