India Ombudsman: Aspect of Tructural-Institutional and Functional
Abstract
Ombudsman is a concept belonging to public administration in general and advocates and protects citizens who are violated of their rights and powers against state institutions. The ombudsman, which finds application areas at different de vlet levels in all continents of the world, is also applied in Asia. The purpose of this article is to provide information on the structural-institutional and functional aspects of the Indian Ombu from Asia. In this context, the place and importance of the ombudsman for Indian democracy and public administration is to be emphasized.
References
Abadan, Y. (1951). Yeni Hint Anayasası. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1-2), 208-255.
Abdioğlu, H. (2007). Yönetişim Ilkelerinin Uygulanmasında Kamu Denetçiliği (Ombudsmanlık) Kurumu Ve Avrupa Birliği Sürecinde Türkiye Açısından Önemi.
Abedin, N. (2013). A Critical and Argumentative Stud y of the Development and Performance of the Ombudsman Institution in a Small Multiracial Society: The Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. Public Organization Review, 13(3): 261-289.
Altuğ, Y. (1968). Vatanda şı İdarenin Yetki Tecavüzlerine Kar şı Koruyan “Ombudsman” Müessesesi. Yargıtay Yüzüncü Yıldönümü Arma ğanı, İstanbul: Cezaevi Matbaası: 159-172.
Baylan, Ö. (1978). Vatanda şın Devlet Yönetimi Hakkındaki Şikâyetleri ve Türkiye İçin İsveç Ombudsman Formülü. Ankara: İçi şleri Bakanlığı Tetkik Kurul Başkanlığı Yayınları.
Bukhari, S. M. H. (2013). Institutional Analysis of Ombudsman: (A Comparative Study of Pakistan, India, UK and USA). Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 5(2): 709-713.
Brown, B. E. (2006). The Government of India in Michael Curtis (Ed.) Introduction to Comparative Government. the United States: Pearson Educations, Inc.: 537-593.
Büyükavci, M. (2008). Ombudsmanlık Kurumu. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 4: 10-13.
Chakrabarty, B. (2008). Indian Politics and Society since Independence: Events, Processes and Ideology. USA: Routledge.
Chakrabarty, B. and Prakash, C. (2012). Public Administration in a Globalizing World: Theories and Practices. India: SAGE Publications.
Cooray, M. J. A. (2000). Ombudsman in Asia: A Case-study of Hong Kong and Sri Lanka, in ed. Roy Gregory -Philip Giddings (Ed.), Righting Wrongs: The Ombudsman in Six Continents. Amsterdam: International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS), IOS Press, ss.75-91.
Carmona, G. V. (2011). Strengthening the Asian Ombudsman Association and the Ombudsman Institutions of Asia, in Strengthening the Ombudsman Institution in Asia: Improving Accountability in Public Service Delivery through the Ombudsman. The Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 1-57.
Doğan, K. C. (2014). Kar şılaştırmalı Ülke İncelemeleri Bağlamında Türk Kamu Yönetiminde Ombudsmanın Uygulanab ilirlik Analizi. Yayınlanmamı ş Doktora Tezi, Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Eren, H. (2000). Ombudsman Kurumu. Atatürk Üniversitesi Erzincan Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, IV(1): 79-9 6.
Erhürman, T. (1998). Ombudsman. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 31(3): 87-102.
Fowlie, F. (2008). A Blueprint for the Evaluation of an Ombudsman’s Office: A Case Study of the ICANN Office of the Ombudsman. A thesis for the degree of Doctor of Conflict Resolution, School of Law Faculty of Law and Management, La Trobe University Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia.
Gellhorn, W. (1966). The Norwegian Ombudsman. Stan ford Law Review, 18(3): 293-321.
Gottehrer, M. (1998). Ombudsman Legislative Resource Document.
Güney, Z. (2014). Hindistan’da Mahalli İdareler.
Hill, L. B. (1976). The Model Ombudsman: Institutionaling New Zealand’s Democratic Experiment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jain, S. N. (1983). India, in Gerald E. Caiden (Ed.). International Handbook of the Ombudsman: Country Surveys, Vol. II, United State of America: Greenwood Press, ss.317-320.
Jiaying, P. and Cheong, L. I. (2008). Comparative Study of Ombudsman Systems of Asia - Review of Systems in Macao, Korea and India. Research Awards on Comparative Studies of Ombudsman Systems in Asia jointly sponsored by Commission against Corruption of Macao and Macao Foundation.
Joshi, P. (2003). Accountability, Indian Administrative Culture and Trust, International Association of Schools and Institutes of Administration. Public Administration: Challenges of Inequality and Exclusion Miami (USA), 14-18 September 2003
Kestane, D. (2006). Çağdaş Bir Denetim Organizasyonu Olarak Ombudsmanlık (Kamu Denetçili ği). Maliye Dergisi, 151: 128-142.
KTO, (2008). Hindistan Cumhuriyeti Ülke Raporu, Kony a: Konya Ticaret Odası Etüd-Ara ştırma Servisi.
Malik, M. S. (2007). A Comprehensive Analysis of the Law of the Ombudsman. The United State of America: Aberdeen University Press.
Mathur, R. N. (1963). Need for an Indian Ombudsman for Successful Planning. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 24(4): 347-354.
Maulion, M. R. (2006-2007). Power and Paradox: Deconstructing Ombudsman Independence amidst the Thicket of the Constitution, Law and Jurisprudence. Ust Law Review, 51,109-154,
Mitchell, J. and Doane, D. (1999). An Ombudsman for Humanitarian Assistance?. Disasters, 23(2): 115-1 24.
Mohanty, M. (2014). Establishment of the Lokpal: Progress towards a New Horizon. Odisha Review, 70(6): 49-53.
Mohanty, P. C. (2014). Indian Constitution: The Chart er of Sovereignty. Odisha Review, 70(6): 72-75.
Mohapatra, A. (2013). Lokpal and the Role of Media in Propping Up Anti-Corruption Movement in India. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research IJSSIR, 2(3): 42-53.
Mutta, S. (2005). İdarenin Denetlenmesi ve Ombudsman Sistemi. İstanbul: Kazancı Kitap.
Pardhasaradhi, Y. and Reddy, V. R. (2014). Fostering e-Governance to fight Corruption: The Indian Experience.
Parlak, B. ve Canrürk, C. (2009). Kar şılaştırmalı Siyasal ve Yönetsel Yapılar. Bursa: Alfa Aktüel.
Pohekar, P. D. (2010). A Study of Ombudsman System in India with Special Reference to Lokayukta in Maharashtra. India: Gyan Publishing House.
Rai, H. and Singh, S. (1976). Ombudsman in India: A Need For Administrative Integrity and Responsiveness. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 37(3): 43-63.
Rowat, D. C. (1962). An Ombudsman Scheme for Canada. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienned'Economique et de Science politique, 28(4): 543-556.
Rowat, D. C. (1973). The Ombudsman Plan: Essays on the Worldwide Spread of an Idea. Canada: McClelland and Stewart Limited, the Canadian Publishers.
Sapers, H. and Zinger, I. (2010). The Ombudsman as a Monitor of Human Rights in Canadian Federal Corrections. Pace Law Review, 30(5): 1512-1529.
Oytan, M. (1975). Ombudsman Eli İle İdarenin Denetimi Konusunda Kıyaslamalı Bir İnceleme. Danı ştay Dergisi, 18-19, 1975: 195-196.
Wassem, M. (2011). Independence of Ombudsmen. In Strengthening the Ombudsman Institution in Asia: Improving Accountability in Public Service Delivery through the Ombudsman, Public Management, Financial Sector, and Trade / 2011, the Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 57-89.
Weeks, K. M. (1978). Ombudsmen around the World: A Comparative Chart. California: Institute of Governmental Studies.
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Science and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)
.jpg)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
