Analysis of the Vulnerability Model for Decision-Making in the Field of Care for the Elderly

  • Fabio Nacimento DaSilva University of Cartago, Panama
Keywords: Vulnerability, Elderly, Decision-Making, Care

Abstract

This article analyzes the validity of vulnerability as a model for decision making regarding the personal and socio-family situation of the elderly person in need of care. The adequacy of the model responds to the centrality of the risk element in decision-making, the nature of care and respect for the principles that inspire the rights of vulnerable older persons. The concept of vulnerability connects with a new conception in which vulnerability is based, not only on the loss of autonomy, but also on the susceptibility to bankruptcy of the rights of dignity and integrity in daily life; in line with an existentially diverse and vulnerable human conception. The incorporation of this approach to the Law of the capacity of the elderly and regulation of social services will require its consideration in the reports and diagnoses of Social Work.

References

ABA. American Bar Association. Commision on Law and Aging & American Psichological Association. (2005). Assessment of Older Adults with Diminished Capacity: A Handbook for Lawyers. Washington, DC: ABA. American Bar Association & American Psichological Association.

Adelantado, J. (2013). La Europa asocial: crisis y Estado del bienestar. Serviço Social & Sociedade, (116), 793-798.

Agrela-Romero, B., Martín-Palomo, M. T. y Langa-Rosado, D. (2010). Modelos de provisión de cuidados: género, familias y migraciones. Nuevos retos y con-figuraciones para las políticas. Alternativas. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 17, 9-17.

Avilés, M. D. C. B. (2016). Vulnerabilidad, derechos humanos y empresas| Vulnerability, human rights and business. Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho, 34, 1-16.

Bello Sánchez, W., González Rego, R. A. (2012). Vulnerabilidad de las perso-nas de la tercera edad ante el riesgo de envejecimiento en Cuba. En C. Ejea Jiménez, D. Sánchez González y J. I. Soledad Suescún, Vulnerabilidad Social. Posicionamientos y ángulos desde geografías diferentes (201-215). Granada: Eirene.

Busso, G. (2001). Vulnerabilidad social: nociones e implicancias de políticas para latinoamérica a inicios del siglo XXI. Seminario Internacional «Las Diferentes expresiones de la Vulnerabilidad Social en América Latina y el Caribe», 20 y 21 de junio. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.

Chambers, R. (1989). Editorial introduction: vulnerability, coping and policy.

Craig, G. M. & Higgs, P. (2012). Risk owners and risk managers: Dealing with the complexity of feeding children with neurodevelopmental disability. Negotiating and communicating health risk. Health, Risk & Society, 14(7-8), 627-637.

Creswel, J. W. (2010). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: University of Nebraska–Lincoln.

Cyr, J. F. S. (2005). At risk: Natural hazards, people's vulnerability, and disasters. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2(2).

Delgado Rodríguez, J. (2012). Nuevas perspectivas bioéticas: autonomía relacio-nal. Revista de Enfermería, 6(1), 35-42.

Esterberg, K. (2002) Qualitative methods in social research. Boston; McGraw Hill.

Fañanás, L. (2002, January). Bases genéticas de la vulnerabilidad a la depresión. In ANALES del sistema sanitario de Navarra (Vol. 25, pp. 21-42).

Flohimont, V. (2018). Le droit ne stigmatise-t-il pas les individus en voulant accueillir la vulnérabilité à tout prix?.

Garrau, M. (2013). Regards croisés sur la vulnérabilité.«Anthropologie conjonctive» et épistémologie du dialogue. Tracés. Revue de sciences humaines, (13), 141-166.

Ipsos Mori. (2014). Understanding the lives of older people living with frailty. A qualitative investigation. London: Age UK.

Martín, M. T. (2011). Autonomía, dependencia y vulnerabilidad en la construcción de la ciudadanía.

Reghezza, M. (2006). Réflexions autour de la vulnérabilité métropolitaine: la métropole parisienne face au risque de crue centennale (Doctoral dissertation).

Salthouse, T. (1996). Commentary: A Cognitive Psychologist´s Perspective on the Assessment of Cognitive Competency. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Sánchez-González, D., & Egea-Jiménez, C. (2011). Enfoque de vulnerabilidad social para investigar las desventajas socioambientales: Su aplicación en el estudio de los adultos mayores. Papeles de población, 17(69), 151-185.

Tappen, R. M., & Beckerman, A. (1993). A Vulnerable Population: Multiproblem Older Adults in Acute Care. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 19(11), 38-42.

Tronto, J. C. (1998). An Ethnic of care. Generations, 22(3), 15-20.

Published
2020-10-27
How to Cite
DaSilva, F. N. (2020). Analysis of the Vulnerability Model for Decision-Making in the Field of Care for the Elderly. International Journal of Science and Society, 2(4), 438-445. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v2i4.229