The Role of Employee Involvement and Psychological Empowerment on Employees' Workforce Agility at PT. XYZ Telecommunication Industry: Intervention Program “Agile Empower”

  • Andi Aisyah Alqumairah Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • Debora Eflina Purba Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
Keywords: Employee Involvement, Psychological Empowerment, Telecommunication, Workforce Agility.

Abstract

Organizational changes such as mergers and acquisitions, evolving customer demands, and increasing business competition in the telecommunications industry require employees of PT. XYZ to work agilely to adapt and implement changes in uncertain conditions. This study aims to examine the role of employee involvement and psychological empowerment in influencing workforce agility among employees at PT. XYZ. A total of 251 permanent employees at the headquarters participated in this research. The measurement tools used were the Workforce Agility Questionnaire (WAQ) by Sherehiy et al. (2014), translated into Indonesian by Alavi (2016); the Employee Involvement Questionnaire (EIQ) by Lawyer (1992), translated into Indonesian by Heckscher (2018); and the Psychological Empowerment Questionnaire (PEQ) by Spreitzer (1995), translated by Aam Amaliah & Laila (2021). The results showed a significant relationship between employee involvement and workforce agility (r = 0.460, p < 0.05), as well as between psychological empowerment and workforce agility (r = 0.680, p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that employee involvement contributed 21% (Standard Estimate = 0.201, p < 0.05) and psychological empowerment contributed 59% (Standard Estimate = 0.593, p < 0.05) to workforce agility. Based on these findings, an Agile Empower intervention was conducted with 26 participants who scored low to moderate in psychological empowerment. Post-intervention evaluation showed a significant improvement in pretest and post-test scores, with a mean difference (p < 0.05) and an implementation evaluation score of 3.7 out of 4.0.

References

Alavi, S., & Wahab, D. A. (2013). A review on workforce agility. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(16), 4195-4199.

Alavi, S. Abd. Wahab, D., Muhamad, N., Arbab Shirani, B. (2014). Organic structure and organizational learning as the main antecedents of workforce agility. International Journal of Production Research, 52(21), 6273-6295. https://doi.org/10/1080/00207543.2014.919420

Estanesti, S. (2015). The Survey of the Relationship between Employee’s Empowerment with Organization`s Agility. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(8), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v5-i8/1762.

Fildzahni., Dina, E., Nurtjahjanti, & Harlina. (2018). Hubungan Antara Workforce Agility Dengan Burnout Pegawai Direktorat Refinery Unit V dan RDMP PT. Pertamina (PERSERO) Balikpapan. (Tesis Psikologi Universitas Diponegoro).

Hamzehkola, R. G., & Naderi, M. (2018). Pengaruh Pelatihan Keterampilan Manajemen Waktu terhadap Pemberdayaan Psikologis Perawat. Advances in Nursing &Midwifery, 28, 9–14.

Lawler, EEI. (1992). The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-involvement Organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Muduli, A. (2016). Exploring the facilitators and mediator of workforce agility: an empirical study. Management Research Review, 39(12), 1567-1586.

Muduli, A., & Pandya, G. (2018). Psychological Empowerment and Workforce Agility. Psychological Studies, 63(3), 276-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-018-0456-8/

Menon, S., & Suresh, M. (2020). Enablers of workforce agility in engineering educational institutions. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-12-2019-0304.

Putri, D. N., & Mangundjaya, W. (2020). Examining the effects of organizational learning on workforce agility through psychological empowerment. Open Journal for Psychological Research, 4(2), 85–94.

Sathyanarayan, K & Rajan, J. (2023). Impact of employee involvement on workforce agility in ites sector in Chennai. South India Journal of Social Sciences, XXXI.

Sumukadas, N, & Sahwney, R. (2004). Workforce agility through employee involvement. IEE Transactions, 36, 1011-1021.

Sherehiy, B., & Karwowski, M. (2014). The relationship between work organization and workforce agility in small manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 44(3), 466-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2014.01.002

Sherehiy, B. Karwowski W., & Layer, J. K. (2007). A review of enterprise agility: concepts, framework, and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37(5), 445-460. https://doi.org/10/1016/j.ergon.2007.01.007

Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Pscyhological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.

Sohrabi, R., Asari, M., & Hozoori, M. J. (2014). Relationship between workforce agility and organizational intelligence (Case study: The companies of Iran High Council of Informatics). Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, 10(4), 279-287. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n4p279.

Van Oyen, M. P., Gel, E. S., & Hopp, W. (2001). Performance opportunity for workforce agility in collaborative and noncollaborative work systems. IIE Transaction.

Published
2024-12-19
How to Cite
Alqumairah, A. A., & Purba, D. E. (2024). The Role of Employee Involvement and Psychological Empowerment on Employees’ Workforce Agility at PT. XYZ Telecommunication Industry: Intervention Program “Agile Empower”. International Journal of Science and Society, 6(4), 395-402. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v6i4.1341