Ecotourism Management at Teluk Tamiang Beach, Pulau Laut Tanjung Selayar, Kotabaru South Kalimantan
Abstract
The coastal area in Teluk Tamiang Village has a relatively high potential for biological natural resources. The potential of natural resources owned by this island can be seen in the ecosystem of coral reefs, reef fish, ornamental fish, seagrass beds and fisheries. In addition to having an ecological function, this ecosystem also has a high aesthetic value for the development ofmarine tourism. The purpose of this study was to determine the suitability class and carrying capacity of marine ecotourism for snorkeling and beach activities that can be utilized in Teluk Tamiang Village, Tanjung Selayar Laut Island District, Kotabaru Regency, South Kalimantan Province. The results showed that the suitability class of marine ecotourism in Teluk Tamiang was in the appropriate and very suitable category, with a capacity for snorkeling tourism activities of 164 people / day with a utilization area of 4.12 ha, and for beach tourism with a utilization area of 1910 meters, able to accommodate tourists as many as 152 people/day. Thus, the total number of tourists that can be accommodated by both types of tourism activities is 317 people/day.
References
2. Bengen, D. G., & Retraubun, A. S. (2006). Menguak realitas dan urgensi pengelolaan berbasis eko-sosio sistem pulau-pulau kecil. Bogor: Pusat Pembelajaran dan Pengembangan Pesisir dan Laut (P4L).
3. Blangy, S., & Mehta, H. (2006). Ecotourism and ecological restoration. Journal for Nature Conservation, 14(3-4), 233-236.
4. Dahuri R. (2009). Strategi Pengembangan Ekowisata Bahari. Retrieved from: https://rokhmindahuri.wordpress.com/tag/pariwisata-bahari/
5. Djamhur, M. (2014). Model Pengembangan Kawasan Konservasi Pesisir dan Pulau Pulau Kecil Berbasis Zonasi (Kasus di Teluk Weda). (Disertasi Institut Pertanian Bogor).
6. English, S., Wilkinson, C., & Baker, V. (1997). Survey manual for tropical marine resources. Townsville: AIMS.
7. Fedora, S. D., & Hudiyono, R. F. (2019). Analisis pemangku kepentingan (stakeholder) pada unit hubungan masyarakat (Humas) dan kesekretariatan PT Semen Padang. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Terapan (JABT), 2(1), 6.
8. Gomez, E. D., & Yap, H. T. (1988). Monitoring Reef Condition in Kenchington. Jakarta: UNESCO Regional Office for Science and Technology for South East Asia.
9. Hossain, M. S., & Das, N. G. (2010). GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation to land suitability modelling for giant prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) farming in Companigonj Upazila of Noakhali, Bangladesh. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 70(1), 172-186.
10. Irwan. (2010). Kajian Potensi dan Pengembangan Ekowisata Bahari di Kawasan Konservasi Laut Daerah Pulau Pasi Kabupaten Selayar. (Tesis Institut Pertanian Bogor).
11. Nontji, A. (2009). Laut Nusantara. Jakarta: Djambatan.
12. Nurjanah, I., Abdullah, A., & Kustiariyah. (2011). Pengetahuan dan Karakteristik Bahan Baku Hasil Perairan. Bogor: IPB Press.
13. Nybakken, J. W. (1998). Biologi Laut: Suatu Pendekatan Ekologis. Jakarta: Gramedia.
14. Odum, E. P. (1994). Dasar-Dasar Ekologi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
15. Pourebrahim, S., Hadipour, M., & Mokhtar, M. B. (2011). Integration of spatial suitability analysis for land use planning in coastal areas; case of Kuala Langat District, Selangor, Malaysia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101(1), 84-97.
16. Romimohtarto, K., & Juwana, S. (2009). Biologi Laut: Ilmu Pengetahuan Tentang Biologi Laut. Jakarta: Djambatan.
17. Setiawan, F. (2011). Panduan Lapangan Identifikasi Ikan Karang dan Invertebrata Laut. Manado: Wildlife Conservation Society.
18. Setyobudiandi, I., Sulistiono, F., Yulianda, C., Kusmana, S., Hariyadi, A., Damar, A., & Sembiring, B. (2009). Sampling dan analisis data perikanan dan kelautan: terapan metode pengambilan contoh di wilayah pesisir dan laut. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
19. Sudarto. (1993). Pembuatan alat pengukur arus secara sederhana. Oseana, 18(1), 35-44.
20. Suharsono. (2008). Jenis-Jenis Karang di Indonesia. Jakarta: LIPI Press.
21. The International Ecotourism Society. (2015). What is Ecotourism. Retrieved from: https://www.ecotourism.org/what-is-ecotourism
22. Tratalos, J. A., & Austin, T. J. (2001). Impacts of recreational SCUBA diving on coral communities of the Caribbean Island of Grand Cayman. Biological Conservation, 102(1), 67-75.
23. Tsaur, S. H., Lin, Y. C., & Lin, J. H. (2006). Evaluating ecotourism sustainability from the integrated perspective of resource, community and tourism. Tourism management, 27(4), 640-653.
24. United Nations Environment Programme. (2001). Protecting the Oceans from Lands-based Activities. Washington (US): GESAMP.
25. Yulianda, F. (2019). Ekowisata Perairan Suatu Konsep Kesesuaian dan Daya Dukung Wisata Bahari dan Wisata Air Tawar. Bogor: IPB Press.
26. Yulianda, F., Fachrudin, A., Hutabarat, A. A., Hartati, S., & Kusharjani, S. K. (2010). Pengelolaan Pesisir dan Laut Secara Terpadu (Integrated Coastal and Marine Managemant). School of Inviromental Conservation and Ecotourism Managemant (SECEM). Ministry of Forestry Republic of Indonesia. KONICA. Korea International Cooperation Agency.
27. Yulianda, F. (2007). Ekowisata Bahari Sebagai Alternatif Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Pesisir Berbasis Konservasi. Bogor: Departemen MSP IPB.
28. Zhang, H., & Lei, S. L. (2012). A structural model of residents’ intention to participate in ecotourism: The case of a wetland community. Tourism management, 33(4), 916-925.
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Science and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.