Concept and Implementation: Managerial Effectiveness in the Era of Society 5.0
Abstract
Managerial Effectiveness in Society 5.0 Era is characterized by rapid changes in technology, management of big data, adaptation of work paradigms, data security, changing employee skills, stronger innovation, ethical considerations, and increasing complexity of the business environment. Managers need to develop strong leadership, adaptability, and understanding of technology and social trends. In facing this challenge, managers need to develop adaptive leadership, creativity in managing resources, and a deep understanding of the implications of technology and social trends. In this journal, we analyze the concept of the managerial effectiveness paradigm needed to face Society 5.0, explore strategies to overcome existing challenges, and identify important implications for developing effective managerial skills. Through a deep understanding of the concept and implementation of managerial effectiveness in the Society 5.0 era, this journal provides valuable insights for practitioners and researchers in facing dynamic changes in the business and social environment.
References
Ali, A., & Patnaik, B. (2014). Managerial effectiveness: A comparative study between managers of private and public undertakings. European Academic Research, 2(1), 233–254.
Bartol, K. M., & Martin, D. C. (1982). Managing information systems personnel: A review of the literature and managerial implications. MIS Quarterly, 49–70.
Campbell, J. P., & Dunnette, M. D. (1968). Effectiveness of T-group experiences in managerial training and development. Psychological Bulletin, 70(2), 73.
Drucker, P. F. (1967). Effective decisions. Harvard University. Graduate school of business administration.
Gupta, S. (1996). Managerial effectiveness: Conceptual framework and scale development. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 31(3), 392–409.
Gustafson, J. M., & Johnson, E. W. (1989). Efficiency, morality, and managerial effectiveness. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 9–28.
Hamlin, R. G. (2005). Toward universalistic models of managerial leader effectiveness: A comparative study of recent British and American derived models of leadership. Human Resource Development International, 8(1), 5–25.
Hill, N. S., Bartol, K. M., Tesluk, P. E., & Langa, G. A. (2009). Organizational context and face-to-face interaction: Influences on the development of trust and collaborative behaviors in computer-mediated groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 187–201.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard Business Press.
Kassem, M. S., & Moursi, M. A. (1971). Managerial effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 14(3), 381–388.
Menon, T., & Pfeffer, J. (2003). Valuing internal vs. external knowledge: Explaining the preference for outsiders. Management Science, 49(4), 497–513.
Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Mintzberg, H. (2017). Managing the myths of health care: Bridging the separations between care, cure, control, and community. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Page, C., Wilson, M., Meyer, D., & Inkson, K. (2003). “It’s the situation I’m in”: the importance of managerial context to effectiveness. Journal of Management Development, 22(10), 841–862.
Pennings, J. M., & Goodman, P. S. (1977). Toward a workable framework. In New perspectives on organizational effectiveness (pp. XVII--275). Jossey-Bass.
Pfeffer, J. (2018). Dying for a paycheck: How modern management harms employee health and company performance—and what we can do about it.
Sen, S., & Saxena, S. (1999). Managerial effectiveness: managing with a difference. Personnel Today, 20(2), 5–11.
Srivastava, S. (2009). Locus of control as a moderator for relationship between organisational role stress and managerial effectiveness. Vision, 13(4), 49–61.
Willcocks, S. G. (1998). Managerial effectiveness in an NHS Hospital Trust: Some observations based on contrasting organizational perspectives. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 11(2/3), 130–138.
Yaras, Z., & Öztürk, F. K. (2022). Society 5.0 in Human Technology Integration: Digital Transformation in Educational Organizations. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), 458–474.
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Science and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)
.jpg)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
