Analysis of the Level of Community Satisfaction with Police in the Depok Metro Jurisdiction

  • Multazam Lisendra Sekolah Kajian Strategis dan Global, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • Chairul Muriman Setyabudi Sekolah Kajian Strategis dan Global, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • Roy Darmawan Sekolah Kajian Strategis dan Global, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
Keywords: Community Satisfaction, Police, Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, Performance.


Community satisfaction is an important instrument in determining the success of the police while carrying out their duties, because community satisfaction is a benchmark for police institutions in achieving reflexive and transitive goals. For this reason, this research aims to assess the extent of community satisfaction with the police in the Depok metro jurisdiction. 4 aspects are used to assess the level of public satisfaction with the police, namely aspects of performance effectiveness, procedural justice, police legitimacy and cooperation. This research uses survey techniques and distributes a set of research questionnaires. A descriptive statistical approach was used for data processing and analysis. The results show that the public is satisfied with the performance of the police in the Depok metro jurisdiction. The 4 aspects used to assess the level of community satisfaction showed an average value of 46.5% and 27.5% of respondents felt satisfied and very satisfied with the effectiveness of police performance; 54.6% and 30% of respondents were satisfied and very satisfied with procedural justice; 44% agree, 25.1% disagree with police legitimacy. Meanwhile cooperation or cooperation showed that 64.2% and 29.6% of respondents were satisfied and very satisfied with the model of cooperation with the police.


1. Akinlabi, O. M. (2017). Young people, procedural justice and police legitimacy in Nigeria. Policing and Society, 27(4), 419–438.
2. Bolger, M. A., Lytle, D. J., & Bolger, P. C. (2021). What matters in citizen satisfaction with police: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 72(September 2020), 101760.
3. Braga, A. A. (2015). Crime & Policing Revisited. National Institute of Justice, 20.
4. Cao, L. (2015). Differentiating confidence in the police, trust in the police, and satisfaction with the police. Policing, 38(2), 239–249.
5. Colin Bolger, P., & Walters, G. D. (2019). The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people’s willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 60(January), 93–99.
6. Dai, M., Hu, X., & Time, V. (2019). Understanding public satisfaction with the police: Military background and interactions between higher education and prior contact with the police. Policing, 42(4), 571–584.
7. Ferdik, F. (2023). Citizen satisfaction with the police and college-based informal social controls: An unexpected finding. Journal of Criminal Justice, 87(June), 102088.
8. Ferdik, F., Frogge, G., & Cooney, M. (2022). Exploring further determinants of citizen satisfaction with the police: The role of strain. Journal of Criminal Justice, 81(May), 101931.
9. Ferdik, F. V., Gist, J., & Blasco, N. (2016). Perceived police legitimacy: investigating its association with college-based informal social controls. Psychology, Crime and Law, 22(3), 252–275.
10. Ferdik, F. V., Gist, J., & Evans, S. Z. (2019). Deviant Peer Associations and Perceived Police Legitimacy: Is There a Connection? In Criminal Justice Policy Review (Vol. 30, Issue 8).
11. Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, T. (2014). Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: a systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 399–428.
12. Gurinskaya, A., & Nalla, M. K. (2020). Citizen Satisfaction With Private Police in Russia: Does Satisfaction With Public Police Matter? Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 36(1), 4–18.
13. Jackson, B. A. (2015). Strengthening trust between police and the public in an era of increasing transparency. 13.
14. Kuo, S. Y., & Shih, Y. C. (2018). An Evaluation of a Community-Oriented Policing Program in Taiwan. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(7), 2016–2044.
15. Lee, H. D., Cao, L., Kim, D., & Woo, Y. (2019). Police contact and confidence in the police in a medium-sized city. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 56(December 2018), 70–78.
16. Lytle, D. J., & Bolger, P. C. (2017). Police satisfaction and disorder: results from a survey of a semi-rural community. Policing and Society, 27(8), 913–926.
17. Merenda, F. (2021). Adventure-Based Programming with at-Risk Youth: Impact upon Self-Confidence and School Attachment. Child and Youth Services, 42(4), 321–348.
18. Merenda, F., Trent, J., Rinke, C. R., & Buchanan, M. (2021). Understanding citizen satisfaction with the police: results from a community survey. Police Practice and Research, 22(1), 692–710.
19. Meško, G., Reisig, M. D., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Procedural justice, police legitimacy and public cooperation with legal authorities. Revija Za Kriminalistiko in Kriminologijo, 63(2), 112–122.
20. Nalla, M. K., & Boke, K. (2011). What’s in a Name? Organizational, Environmental, and Cultural Factors on Support for Community Policing in Turkey and the U.S. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 17(4), 285–303.
21. Nivette, A. E., & Akoensi, T. D. (2019). Determinants of satisfaction with police in a developing country: a randomised vignette study. Policing and Society, 29(4), 471–487.
22. Przeszlowski, K. S., & Crichlow, V. J. (2018). An exploratory assessment of community-oriented policing implementation, social disorganization and crime in America. Social Sciences, 7(3).
23. Reisig, M. D., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. G. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(8), 1005–1028.
24. Robertho, A. R., Maros, A., & Hidayat, N. Al. (2021). The Implementation of National Police Assesment Center in Encouraging Open Career Promotion. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 11(2), 534–541.
25. Robinson, M. A. (2018). Using multi-item psychometric scales for research and practice in human resource management. Human Resource Management, 57(3), 739–750.
26. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing. Law and Society Review, 37(3), 513–548.
27. Tillyer, R. (2018). Assessing the Impact of Community-oriented Policing on Arrest. Justice Quarterly, 35(3), 526–555.
28. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.
29. Wheelock, D., Stroshine, M. S., & O’Hear, M. (2019). Disentangling the Relationship Between Race and Attitudes Toward the Police: Police Contact, Perceptions of Safety, and Procedural Justice. Crime and Delinquency, 65(7), 941–968.
How to Cite
Lisendra, M., Setyabudi, C. M., & Darmawan, R. (2024). Analysis of the Level of Community Satisfaction with Police in the Depok Metro Jurisdiction. International Journal of Science and Society, 6(1), 137-152.