State Policy to Attract Investment Based on Tax Exemption: Economic Analysis of Developing Countries in the 2016-2022 Period
Abstract
This paper is intended to respond to the following questionings: facing national policies dismantling, which focused on regional development and heterogeneity obliteration among the different regions, how much can state tax and financial incentives alter inter-regional labor division and change territorial productive specializations? Do fiscal incentives necessarily change state industrial activity within national production? Do they bear straight relation to the state productive structures’ alterations? The subsidizing data, for the present analysis, illustrate that tax reduction do not necessarily contribute to regional industrial activity decentralization. Furthermore, many of the activities which were favored by the aforementioned incentives and presented spatial decentralization were also influenced, to a considerable extent, by other conditioning circumstances, mainly observed in non-durable consumer goods’ producing activities. This paper aims to show that the Ceará State policy of attraction of companies, since the years 2018-2022, was not capable of modify the participation of the state in the Value of the Industrial Transformation, neither promote significant changes in its productive structure in a way to offer greater diversification and bigger complexity of its industrial structure.
References
Chaurasiya, P. K., Warudkar, V., & Ahmed, S. (2019). Wind energy development and policy in India: A review. Energy Strategy Reviews, 24, 342-357.
Dao, M. X., Loan, N. T. C., Phuong, N. H., & Van Vien, V. (2020). Superiority of the Policy to Attract Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Capital of Viet Nam through the Us-China Trade War. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(7), 13971-13976.
Dawley, S., MacKinnon, D., & Pollock, R. (2019). Creating Strategic Couplings in global production networks: regional institutions and lead firm investment in the Humber region, UK. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(4), 853-872.
Fahad, S., Bai, D., Liu, L., & Baloch, Z. A. (2022). Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulation on foreign direct investment: do environmental regulation affect FDI decisions?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(4), 5092-5104.
Francois, A., Panel, S., & Weill, L. (2020). Educated dictators attract more foreign direct investment. Journal of Comparative Economics, 48(1), 37-55.
Hooijmaaijers, B. (2019). Blackening skies for Chinese investment in the EU?. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 24, 451-470.
Kholiavko, N., Grosu, V., Safonov, Y., Zhavoronok, A., & Cosmulese, C. G. (2021). Quintuple helix model: investment aspects of higher education impact on sustainability. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 43(1), 111-128.
Kostiukevych, R., Mishchuk, H., Zhidebekkyzy, A., Nakonieczny, J., & Akimov, O. (2020). The impact of European integration processes on the investment potential and institutional maturity of rural communities. Economics & Sociology, 13(3), 46-63.
Majid, M. A. (2020). Renewable energy for sustainable development in India: current status, future prospects, challenges, employment, and investment opportunities. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 10(1), 1-36.
Manning, S., & Richter, C. (2022). Upgrading against the odds: How peripheral regions can attract global lead firms. Journal of International Business Policy, 1-23.
Mardievna, S. G., & Boltaevna, S. F. (2021). The role of public-private partnerships in attracting investment projects in the transport sector. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government Vol, 27(6).
Matura, T. (2019). China–CEE trade, investment and politics. Europe-Asia Studies, 71(3), 388-407.
Medve-Bálint, G., & Šćepanović, V. (2020). EU Funds, State Capacity and the Development of Transnational Industrial Policies in Europe’s Eastern Periphery. Review of International Political Economy, 27(5), 1063-1082.
Nikulina, S. N., Butyugina, A. A., & Gorbunova, E. E. (2019, October). Investment Activity in Conditions of Automation Use of Budgeting System. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 341, No. 1, p. 012217). IOP Publishing.
Rajabov, N., & Mustafakulov, S. I. (2020). Econometric Analysis of the Impact of the Investment Climate on the Sustainability of Socio-Economic Development of navoi region. Архив научных исследований.
Tan, J., & Zhao, J. Z. (2019). The Rise of Public–Private Partnerships in China: An Effective Financing Approach for Infrastructure Investment?. Public Administration Review, 79(4), 514-518.
Vakulchuk, R., Chan, H. Y., Kresnawan, M. R., Merdekawati, M., Overland, I., Sagbakken, H. F., & Yurnaidi, Z. (2020). Lao PDR: How to Attract More Investment in Small-Scale Renewable Energy?. Oslo, Norway,: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI).
Wall, R., Grafakos, S., Gianoli, A., & Stavropoulos, S. (2019). Which Policy Instruments Attract Foreign Direct Investments in Renewable Energy?. Climate policy, 19(1), 59-72.
Zafar, M. W., Zaidi, S. A. H., Khan, N. R., Mirza, F. M., Hou, F., & Kirmani, S. A. A. (2019). The Impact of Natural Resources, Human Capital, and Foreign Direct Investment on the Ecological Footprint: The Case of the United States. Resources Policy, 63, 101428.
Zhu, M., Qi, Y., Belis, D., Lu, J., & Kerremans, B. (2019). The China Wind Paradox: The Role of State-Owned Enterprises in Wind Power Investment Versus Wind Curtailment. Energy Policy, 127, 200-212.
Ҳакимова, М. С. (2021). State Policy to Attract Foreign Investment in the Industrial Development of the Country. Вестник Бохтарского государственного университета имени Носира Хусрава. Серия гуманитарных и экономических наук, (1-2), 186-192.
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Science and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)
.jpg)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
