LPTK Laboratory School Curriculum Management as Actualization of Independent Campus in Indonesia
(Study of Labschool UPI, UNJ, UNP, and UNDIKSHA)
Abstract
This research focuses on curriculum management in the Laboratory Schools under the LPTK. Planning, actuating, and controlling are forms of curriculum management at the Labschool of Indonesian Education University (UPI), Ganesha Education University (UNDIKSHA), Padang State University (UNP), and Jakarta State University (UNJ). The method used is qualitative with purposive sampling. The subjects in this study were the principal, the head of the foundation/LPTK, teachers, and administrative staff. The results showed that curriculum management planning in each laboratory school was administratively implemented by a curriculum development team involving input from the LPTK. The implementation is fully in the control of the principal and vice principal in the field of curriculum, and a special team from the LPTK and foundations carries out supervision. This research is expected to provide an overview of curriculum management in laboratory schools and a reference for laboratory schools under the LPTK in Indonesia.
References
Angus, L. (1994). Sociological Analysis and Education Management: The Social Context of the Self‐Managing School. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(1), 79-91.https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569940150105
Ashari, M. (2020). Action Plan Wujudkan Kampus Merdeka. Retrieved from https://www.jawapos.com/opini/05/02/2020/action-plan-wujud-kampus-merdeka/
Beare, H., & Boyd, W. L. (1993). Restructuring Schools: An International Perspective on the Movement to Transform the Control and Performance of Schools. London: Falmer Press.
Brown, D. J. (1990). Decentralization and School-based Management. London: Falmer Press
Bush, T., & Middlewood, D. (2005). Leading and managing people in education. London: Sage Publication.
Caldwell, B. J., & Spinks, J. M. (1986). The Self Managing School. London: Falmer Press.
Cheng, Y. C. (1993). The theory and characteristics of school‐based management. International Journal of Educational Management, 7(6).
Connell, R. W. (1991). Social justice in education — the key role of curriculum. Paper presented at the Biannual Conference of the Australian Curriculum Studies Association, Adelaide.
David, J. L. (1989). Synthesis of Research on School-based Management. Educational Leadership, 46, 545–553.
Engkoswara. (1987). Dasar-dasar Administrasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Fullan, M. (1997). What's worth for in the principalship?. New York: Teachers College.
Gaziel, H. (1998). School-based management as a factor in school effectiveness. International Review of Education, 44(4), 319-333.
Gurley, D. K., Peters, G. B., Collins, L., & Fifolt, M. (2015). Mission, vision, values, and goals: An exploration of key organizational statements and daily practice in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 16(2), 217-242.
Hartley, D. (2004). Management, leadership and the emotional order of the school. Journal of education policy, 19(5), 583-594. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093042000269153
Held, D. (1989). Political Theory and the Modem State. London: Polity Press.
Hill, T. (1989). Managing the Primary School. Studies in Primary Education. London: David Fulton Publishers.
Moon, B. (1996). Challenging the Idea of Centralized Control: The Reform of the French Curriculum in a European Context. In: A. Corbett and B. Moon, eds., Education in France (142–164). London: Routledge.
Morrison, K. (2010). Complexity theory, school leadership and management: Questions for theory and practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(3), 374-393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143209359711
Morrison, M. (1991). Finding the right dominoes. Introducing school development plans: A case‐study of primary school management. School Organisation, 11(2), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.1991.10384448
Nasution, S. (1988). Qualitative Naturalistic Research Methods. Bandung: Tarsito
Nias, D. J., Southworth, G. W., & Yeomans, R. (1989). Staff Relationships in the Primary School: a study of school cultures. London: Cassell.
O'Hanlon, J., & Clifton, D. O. (2004). Effective principals: Positive principles at work. Lanham: Scarecrow Education.
Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (1982). In Searching for Excellence. NY: Harper and Row.
Reshef, S. (1984). Autonomy in Education. Tel-Aviv: Tel Aviv University, School of Education (Hebrew).
Sari, D. N. A (2018). Implementation of School Based Management. Journal of Educational Administration and Management, 1, 213–221.
Sagala, S. (2010). Strategic Management in Improving the Quality of Education, Opening Space for Creativity, Innovation, and Empowering the Potential of Schools in the School Autonomy System. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sharpe, F. G. (1994). Devolution: Towards a Research Framework. Educational Management and Administration, 22, 85–95
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukaningtyas, D. (2017). Pengembangan Kapasitas Manajemen Sekolah dalam Membangun Pemahaman Visi dan Misi. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36 (2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i2.11844
Wallace, G. (1992). Local Management of Schools; Research and Experience. Clevedons, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Wexler, P. (1987). Social Analysis of Education. New York: Routledge.
Quicke, J. (1988). The 'New Right' and education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 26, 5-20.
Young, P. G. (2004). You have to go to school - You're the principal!. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Science and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)
.jpg)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
