Legal Reconstruction: Ingsutan Paradigmatic on the Determination of the Positivism Paradigm and Legal Positivism in Law Enforcement in Indonesia
Abstract
Law as control should regard the reality, values and factors that determine every society's behaviour or action. As defined by the positivism and legal positivism paradigm, law enforcement should shift into a constructivist legal paradigm framework to reconstruct a more comprehensive law. Written law has a limited reach because it is quickly left behind by considering that the text of statutory rules is formulated in a different space and time than the current conditions. Through hermeneutic interpretation of the law, law enforcers are expected to understand every legal issue confined in legal texts and the context of the reality of the problem in depth. Law enforcers are guided by the methodology of legal discovery, which is driven by applicable laws and human behaviour. Every person who carries out every behaviour or action (actus) must be understood to the deepest or hidden layer, namely the subjective motivations behind his actions. Law enforcers must view reality as conceptual reality by making ideas as hypotheses to understand truth collectively and comprehensively.
References
Ardhiwisastra, Y. B. (2000). Penafsiran dan Konstruksi Hukum. Bandung: Alumni.
Awuy, T. F. (1994). Menolak Logosentrisme, Merayakan Perbedaan. Jakarta: Kalam.
Chalmers Alan, F. (1999). What is a thing called science? St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
Guba, E. G., Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Califónia: Sage Publication.
Hakim, A. (2017). Menakar Rasa Keadilan Pada Putusan Hakim Perdata Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Yang Bukan Pihak Berdasarkan Perspektif Negara Hukum Pancasila. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 6(3), 361-378.
Harris, C. D. (1986). Dictionary of Human Geography. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Hermansyah, H. (2009). Pendekatan Hermeneutik Dalam Penegakan Hukum (Upaya Dekonstruksi Terhadap Positivisme Hukum). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 9(3), 215-223.
Indarti, E. (2010). Diskresi dan Paradigma: Sebuah telaah filsafat hukum.
Irianto, S. (Ed.). (2009). Metode Peneltian Hukum: Konstelasi dan Refleksi. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Lathif, N. (2017). Teori Hukum Sebagai Sarana Alat Untuk Memperbaharui Atau Merekayasa Masyarakat. Pakuan Law Review, 3(1).
Lisdiyono, E., & Mulyani, S. (2021). Implications of Legal Positivism on Cybercrime Law Enforcement in Indonesia in the Case of the Hacking of the Mojokerto City Government Website. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 891-896.
Maramis, F. (2012). Hukum Pidana umum dan tertulis di Indonesia. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
McCoubrey, H. (1999). Textbook on jurisprudence. London: Blackstone Press Limited.
Prasetyo, T. (2020). Initiating Law Reform in Indonesia (From the Dignified Justice Perspective). Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 3(1), 14-25.
Republic of Indonesia, Supreme Court. Sanggau District Court Decision Number: 111 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PNSag Concerning the Prohibition of Using Cannabis as Treatment.
Roman, E. (1998). Reconstructing Self-Determination: The Role of Critical Theory in the Positivist International Law Paradigm. U. Miami L. Rev., 53, 943.
Rustamaji, M. (2015). Prison of Legal Positivism Paradigm and Corruption Eradication in Indonesia. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalisation, 35.
Samekto, F. (2012). Menggugat Relasi Filsafat Positivisme Dengan Ajaran Hukum Doktrinal. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(1), 74-84.
Sarmadi, A. S. (2012). Membebaskan Positivisme Hukum Ke Ranah Hukum Progresif (Studi Pembacaan Teks Hukum Bagi Penegak Hukum). Dinamika Hukum, 12(2), 331-343.
Shidarta. (2013). Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Sinaga, H. D. P. (2018, July). Reorientation of Tax Legal Certainty in Indonesia: An Exploration of Transcendental Law. In 1st International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies (ICILS 2018) (pp. 282-287). Atlantis Press.
Siswomihardjo, K. W. (1982). Arti" perkembangan" menurut filsafat positivisme Auguste Comte dengan summary (Doctoral dissertation, [Yogyakarta]: Universitas Gadjah Mada).
Soeprapto, M. F. I., & Attamimi, A. H. S. (1998). Ilmu Perundang-undangan: Dasar-dasar dan pembentukannya. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Time for Punishment with Subjectivity: Study Philosophy of Law. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 1(1), 17-32.
Suparman, E. (2012). Pendistribusian Keadilan Oleh Pengadilan Serta Budaya Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 1(3), 399-416.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2001). Socio-legal positivism and a general jurisprudence. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 21(1), 1-32.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2007). The contemporary relevance of legal positivism. Austl. J. Leg. Phil., 32, 1.
The Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 11 of 2008 in conjunction with Law 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions
The Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics
The Republic of Indonesia. Supreme Court. Cassation Decision Number 574 K/Pid.Sus / 2018 of the Republic of Indonesia. Supreme Court. Review Decision Number 83 PK / PID.SUS / 2019
The Republic of Indonesia. Supreme Court. Mataram District Court Decision Number 265 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN Mtr
Tjahjadi, S. L. (1991). Hukum moral ajaran Immanuel Kant tentang etika dan imperatif kategoris. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia.
Tyesta, L. A., Saraswati, R., & Arif, F. (2020). Implications of Legal Positivism of the Promotion of Children's Rights on National Law. J. Advanced Res. L. & Econ., 11, 661.
Utami, N. S., Suteki, S., Saraswati, R., & Budiono, A. (2018). Faith In God, Independence Of Law And Independence Of Judges: Study Of Theistic Legal Realism In Legal Settlement. Justicia Islamica, 15(2), 195-208.
Widowati, C., & Wijayanta, T. (2020). The Dialectic Study on the Legal Findings by the Judge as a Criticism and Support to Legal Positivism. Talent Development & Excellence, 12.
Wuisman, J. J. J. M. (1996). Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Jilid 1: Asas-asas. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit FE-UI.
Zuliyah, S. (2019). The Importance Of Moral Values Through Law Enforcement In Indonesia In Nonsystematic Legal Approach. Journal of Transcendental Law, 1(2), 159-174.
Zuliyah, S., & Triwahyuningsih, T. (2018, November). Moral Aspect in the Law Enforcement in Indonesia: Prophetic Perspective. In Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2018). Atlantis Press.
1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Science and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)
.jpg)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
-modified.png)
