Implications of Marriage Agreements on the Status of Couples' Property on Money Laundering Criminal Acts in Indonesia

  • Alan Kurniawan Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Dyah Permata Budi Asri Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Markoni Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • I Made Kanthika Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Prenuptial Agreement, Corruption Crimes, Money Laundering, Legal Protection, Evidence.

Abstract

This study examines the implications of prenuptial agreements on the status of marital property in Money Laundering Crimes (TPPU). The research aims to analyze the legal status of assets separated through prenuptial agreements when one spouse is involved in money laundering, and to evaluate legal protection mechanisms for good-faith spouses. The study focuses on the conflict between the principle of party autonomy in marriage law and the principles of follow the money and asset recovery under the Anti-Money Laundering Act. The method used is normative juridical, employing statutory and theoretical approaches, including the theory of legal protection, the theory of evidence, and the concept of reverse burden of proof. Findings reveal that prenuptial agreements hold a strategic role as instruments of legal certainty under the principle of freedom of contract and the 1945 Constitution. However, in practice, within money laundering and corruption cases, their effectiveness is limited because the principles of follow the money and reverse burden of proof grant broad authority to law enforcement to seize assets even if formally legitimate. The normative conflict between civil and criminal law creates legal uncertainty disadvantaging third parties, while existing protections remain suboptimal due to high evidentiary standards and procedural barriers. Thus, regulatory harmonization is necessary to ensure legal certainty, prevent misuse of prenuptial agreements, and provide effective protection for good-faith spouses.

References

Adriaman, M. (2024). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah.

Agustine, O. V. (2019). RUU Perampasan Aset Sebagai Peluang Dan Tantangan Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Hukum Pidana Dan Pembangunan Hukum, 1(2).

Amal, M. R. H. (2021). Contribution of Islamic Law in Tackling Money Laundering Crimes in Indonesia. International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS), 2(1), 24–34.

Asmuni, A., Hasibuan, P., & Maswandi, M. (2020). Criminal Law Study Behind The Polyandri Marriage In Indonesia. International Journal For Innovative Research In Multidisciplinary Field, 6(9), 110–114.

Bureni, I. F. K. (2016). Kekosongan Hukum Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan Dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(4), 292–298.

Butarbutar, E. N. (2012). Hukum harta kekayaan menurut sistematika KUH Perdata & perkembangannya. Refika Aditama.

Butt, S. (2023). Indonesia’s new Criminal Code: indigenising and democratising Indonesian criminal law? Griffith Law Review, 32(2), 190–214.

De Sanctis, F. M. (2017). International money laundering through real estate and agribusiness. Springer.

Denniagi, E. (2021). Analisis Ke-Ekonomian Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Lex Renaissance, 6(2), 246–264.

Faradz, H. (2008). Tujuan dan manfaat perjanjian perkawinan. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 8(3), 249–252.

Fuadi, G., Putri, W. V., & Raharjo, T. (2024). Tinjauan perampasan aset dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang dari perspektif keadilan. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 5(1), 53–68.

Hamzah, A. (2001). Ide yang melatar belakangi Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian. Disampaikan Pada Acara Seminar Nasional Debat Publik Tentang Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Yang Dilakukan Oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti Di Jakarta Tanggal, 11.

Haris, A. (2019). Legal Politics In Erading The Crime Of Money Laundering In Indonesia. Legal Reconstruction in Indonesia Based on Human Right.

Herryanto, I. (2021). Analisis yuridis terhadap putusan Pengadilan Negeri yang mengenyampingkan putusan peninjauan kembali yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap (studi Putusan Nomor 16/Pdt. G/2017/PN. Mbo). SKRIPSI-2019.

Kamil, I., & Uce, F. M. (2024). Penerapan Non Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara. Simbur Cahaya, 327–344.

Komnas, H. A. M. (2019). Menata Ulang RUU Penyadapan dalam Perspektif HAM. Komnas HAM.

Latifah, M. (2016). Urgensi Pembentukan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Di Indonesia (The Urgency Of Assets Recovery Act In Indonesia). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 6(1), 17–30.

Lengkong, L. Y. (2023). Urgensi Penerapan Perampasan Aset Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Hukum To-Ra: Hukum Untuk Mengatur Dan Melindungi Masyarakat, 9(3), 351–364.

Martinelli, I., Suni, I. E., Istisofania, A. S., & Julydya, P. D. (2024). Menelaah Batasan Perjanjian Kawin Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Dan Riset Sosial Humaniora, 4(2), 204–215.

Nugraha, S. P. (2020). Kebijakan Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi. National Conference on Law Studies (NCOLS), 2(1), 987–1000.

Pradnyawati, P., & Laba, I. N. (2018). Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Perlawanan Pihak Ketiga (Derden Verzet) Terhadap Putusan Verstek. Wicaksana: Jurnal Lingkungan Dan Pembangunan, 2(1), 25–33.

Rafiqi, R., Meher, M., & Siregar, F. Y. D. (2025). Corruption and Marriage Agreements Legal Analysis of Property Ownership. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 24(1), 556–564.

Salasa, A. (2016). Penyitaan Sebagai Objek Praperadilan. Lex Privatum, 4(3).

Sunggara, M. A. (2025). Analysis of the Criminal Law Implications on the Sale of Marital Property Prior to the Agreement on Joint Property Division in Indonesia. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(3), 1988–1993.

Supriadi, M., Husain, N. A., Akadol, N. S. J., Gayatri, N. D., Yuliana, Y., & Natalia, K. (2025). The Deviation of Criminal Law Principles in Embezzlement of Joint Property Committed by Husband or Wife. Jurnal Mahkamah: Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 39–52.

Surjanti, S. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Harta Dalam Perkawinan. Yustitiabelen, 2(1), 70–102.

Published
2025-08-26
How to Cite
Kurniawan, A., Asri, D. P. B., Markoni, & Kanthika, I. M. (2025). Implications of Marriage Agreements on the Status of Couples’ Property on Money Laundering Criminal Acts in Indonesia. International Journal of Science and Society, 7(3), 194-202. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v7i3.1501

Most read articles by the same author(s)