The Validity of Wiretapping as Evidence in Corruption Cases

  • Denzel Andersson Cahyono Faculty of Law, Tarumanagara University, Indonesia
  • Gunardi Lie Faculty of Law, Tarumanagara University, Indonesia
Keywords: Wiretapping, Evidence, Corruption Crime.

Abstract

Corruption crimes committed by state officials in Indonesia are rampant. Therefore, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), as an independent institution, has a heavy-duty to investigate the perpetrators of Corruption Crimes in Indonesia. Of course, the KPK in the trial requires strong evidence to reveal the perpetrators of special crimes, namely corruption. With this evidence, the KPK will be able to prove that the perpetrator is proven to have committed the crime of corruption It is known that the KPK Law has just been revised, Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission. Where there are changes in procedures listed in the new law. This refers to how the KPK can conduct wiretapping and obtain official permission to wiretap perpetrators who are indicated to have committed corruption crimes.

References

Abdul Kadir. (2001). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana dan Acara Pidana. Ghalia Indonesia.

Abdul Kadir. (2004). Law and Legal Research. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Hamzah, A. (1985). Introduction to Indonesian criminal procedure. Ghana Indonesia.

Sofyan, A., & Asis, A. (2014). Criminal procedure law: An introduction. Premedia Group.

Farid, A. Z. A. (1995). Criminal law (1st ed.). Sinar Grafika.

Siregar, A. (2015). Legal research methodology. Pustaka Bangsa Press.

Rahim, A. (2019). International values of Sipakatau, Sipakalebbi, Sipakainge' in efforts to prevent corruption. Al-himayah Journal, 3(1), March.

Garner, B. A. (2004). Black's law dictionary. Thomson.

Rosikah, C. D., & Listianingsih, D. M. (2016). Anti-corruption education. Sinar Grafika.

Prinst, D. (1998). Criminal procedure law in practice. Djambatan.

Napitupulu, D. R. W. (2010). KPK in action. Raih Asa Sukses.

Supriyadi, D., et al. (2017). Encyclopedia of anticorruption. Borobudur Inspira Nusantara.

Ediwarman. (2015). Legal research methods monograph (Guide to writing thesis and dissertation). Sofmedia.

Hartanti, E. (2005). Corruption crime. Sinar Grafika.

Tahulending, F. (2018). Wiretapping by the Corruption Eradication Commission viewed from the aspects of human rights according to Law Number 39 of 1999. Lex Crimen, 7(6), August.

Sasangka, H., & Rosita, L. (2003). Law of evidence in criminal cases. Mandar Maju.

Simorangkir, J. C. T., et al. (2010). Legal dictionary. Sinar Grafika.

Arsyad, J. H. (2017). Corruption in the perspective of human rights. Sinar Grafika.

Kristian. (2013). A little about wiretapping in Indonesian positive law. Nuansa Aulia.

Mochtar, M. A. (2009). Reversal of the burden of proof in corruption. Secretariat General and Registrar of the Constitutional Court.

Harahap, M. Y. (2006). Discussion of problems and application of KUHAP: Trial examination, appeal, cassation, and judicial review (2nd ed.). Sinar Grafika.

Prodjohamidjojo, M. (1984). Commentary on KUHAP: Kitab undang-undang hukum acara pidana. Pradnya Paramitha.

Moeljatno. (2002). Principles of criminal law. Rineka Cipta.

Fuady, M. (2006). Legal theory of evidence (civil and criminal). Citra Aditya Bakti.

Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Legal research. Kencana.

Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Legal research (Rev. ed.). Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Madani, R., & Siregar, D. (2022). The effect of wiretapping on corruption cases. Publika Scientific Journal, 10(2), July-December.

Manthovani, R. (2015). Wiretapping VS privacy (1st ed.). Buana Popular Science.

Ridwan, H. R. (2011). State administration law. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Klitgaard, R. (2001). Eradicating corruption. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Soekanto, S. (2008). Factors affecting law enforcement. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soekanto, S. (2015). Introduction to legal research. University of Indonesia UI Press.

Subekti. (2001). The law of evidence. Pradnya Paramitha.

Sudarsono. (2009). Law dictionary. Rineka Cipta.

Mertokusumo, S. (1998). Indonesian civil procedure law. Liberty.

Eddyono, S. W. (2007). Critical notes on Law No. 13/2006 on witness and victim protection. Elsam.

Yamin, & Wuryandari, U. S. W. (2014). Extracts: Legal research methods. Pancasila University.

Saragih, Y. M., & Sahlepi, M. A. (2019). Wiretapping authority in corruption eradication. Journal of Criminal Law and Legal Development, 1(2).

Zainuddin. (2009). Legal research methods. Sinar Grafika.

Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, State Gazette of 2008, Number 58, Supplement to State Gazette Number 4843.

Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, State Gazette of 2019, Number 197, Supplement to State Gazette Number 6409.

Law Number 20 of 2001 on Corruption, State Gazette 2001, Number 134, Supplement to State Gazette Number 4150.

Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption, State Gazette of 1999, Number 140, Supplement to State Gazette Number 3874.

Law Number 36 of 1999 on Telecommunications, State Gazette of 1999, Number 154, Supplement to State Gazette Number 3881.

Published
2024-06-13
How to Cite
Cahyono, D. A., & Lie, G. (2024). The Validity of Wiretapping as Evidence in Corruption Cases. International Journal of Science and Society, 6(2), 649-658. Retrieved from http://ijsoc.goacademica.com/index.php/ijsoc/article/view/1189